Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Leblood!!

Ledick!!

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/hey-l ... 1710773115

Monkey_Driven wrote:

4/5 wrote:The Warriors are just too good and too deep for the Cavs. I'll give Cleveland a lot of credit for keeping the series as close as they have, but I think the Dubs really shouldn't look back from this point forward.

Are they even deeper than the Spurs last year?? I think they probably are, which is mind boggling to me.

They are insanely deep. I was really looking forward to a Clippers/Warriors WCF to see the Warriors' bench obliterate the Clips' lackeys.

4/5 wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

4/5 wrote:The Warriors are just too good and too deep for the Cavs. I'll give Cleveland a lot of credit for keeping the series as close as they have, but I think the Dubs really shouldn't look back from this point forward.

Are they even deeper than the Spurs last year?? I think they probably are, which is mind boggling to me.

They are insanely deep. I was really looking forward to a Clippers/Warriors WCF to see the Warriors' bench obliterate the Clips' lackeys.

I remember reading about the contract stuff that allows them to be this deep, so it'll probably be temporary, but for now it's crazy how deep they are.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Leblood!!

Ledick!!

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/hey-l ... 1710773115

Looks pretty small

4/5 wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

4/5 wrote:The Warriors are just too good and too deep for the Cavs. I'll give Cleveland a lot of credit for keeping the series as close as they have, but I think the Dubs really shouldn't look back from this point forward.

Are they even deeper than the Spurs last year?? I think they probably are, which is mind boggling to me.

They are insanely deep. I was really looking forward to a Clippers/Warriors WCF to see the Warriors' bench obliterate the Clips' lackeys.

I remember reading about the contract stuff that allows them to be this deep, so it'll probably be temporary, but for now it's crazy how deep they are.

spike wrote:

4/5 wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

4/5 wrote:The Warriors are just too good and too deep for the Cavs. I'll give Cleveland a lot of credit for keeping the series as close as they have, but I think the Dubs really shouldn't look back from this point forward.

Are they even deeper than the Spurs last year?? I think they probably are, which is mind boggling to me.

They are insanely deep. I was really looking forward to a Clippers/Warriors WCF to see the Warriors' bench obliterate the Clips' lackeys.

I remember reading about the contract stuff that allows them to be this deep, so it'll probably be temporary, but for now it's crazy how deep they are.

yeah, weren't the clippers considered the deepest team just like two years ago?

4/5 wrote:

spike wrote:

4/5 wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

4/5 wrote:The Warriors are just too good and too deep for the Cavs. I'll give Cleveland a lot of credit for keeping the series as close as they have, but I think the Dubs really shouldn't look back from this point forward.

Are they even deeper than the Spurs last year?? I think they probably are, which is mind boggling to me.

They are insanely deep. I was really looking forward to a Clippers/Warriors WCF to see the Warriors' bench obliterate the Clips' lackeys.

I remember reading about the contract stuff that allows them to be this deep, so it'll probably be temporary, but for now it's crazy how deep they are.

yeah, weren't the clippers considered the deepest team just like two years ago?

And then Doc Rivers happened.

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Leblood!!

Ledick!!

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/hey-l ... 1710773115

Looks pretty small

remember, lebron's an abnormally large person though. imagine how small our penises would look on him.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Leblood!!

Ledick!!

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/hey-l ... 1710773115

Looks pretty small

remember, lebron's an abnormally large person though. imagine how small our penises would look on him.

Maybe....it looked like a 6 incher to me tops though.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Leblood!!

Ledick!!

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/hey-l ... 1710773115

Looks pretty small

remember, lebron's an abnormally large person though. imagine how small our penises would look on him.

Maybe....it looked like a 6 incher to me tops though.

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i can't wait until i get home to see this

Monkey_Driven wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i can't wait until i get home to see this

Just take a bathroom break and view it in a toilet stall.

spike wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i can't wait until i get home to see this

Just take a bathroom break and view it in a toilet stall.

do you think lenny's ever rubbed one out at work?

spike wrote:

Monkey_Driven wrote:

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i can't wait until i get home to see this

Just take a bathroom break and view it in a toilet stall.

do you think lenny's ever rubbed one out at work?

zeb wrote:I'm imagining Lenny's face getting flush typing that.