Red Mosquito

tree_ wrote:

wease wrote:If the democrats ran someone as vile and loathsome as Trump but with their own left-minded positions, would they win? (And I’m not sure how they could even do that.)

personality Trumps policy for low(false)-information voters

Why aren't the dems screaming voting fraud today? It would be working/acceptable if Trump was, why not give it a try?

BurtReynolds wrote:

tree_ wrote:

warehouse wrote:do the dems need to appeal to middle class white people on twitter more? is that why she lost?

are you kidding? Musk made Twitter MAGA central

He simply removed the censor's hand from the scale and allowed reality to become visible. Whether you choose to look at it is not in his power.

yeah thats all he did...

has she conceded yet?

BurtReynolds wrote:Honestly I think dems will be in pretty good shape in 4 years. Biden will almost certainly be dead, Pelosi and Schumer almost certainly will, and their might be an opportunity for a revitalized dem party that maybe goes back to being pro-union or something.

But they gotta drop all that woke shit. And I don't know if they can. The mindworm has dug deep.

they'll win in 2028 by default, almost how Biden won in 2020. but like 2024, in 2032 they'll use 2028 as a mandate and forget the past mistakes and go on to lose.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Honestly I think dems will be in pretty good shape in 4 years. Biden will almost certainly be dead, Pelosi and Schumer almost certainly will, and their might be an opportunity for a revitalized dem party that maybe goes back to being pro-union or something.

But they gotta drop all that woke shit. And I don't know if they can. The mindworm has dug deep.

they'll win in 2028 by default, almost how Biden won in 2020. but like 2024, in 2032 they'll use 2028 as a mandate and forget the past mistakes and go on to lose.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tree_ wrote:

wease wrote:If the democrats ran someone as vile and loathsome as Trump but with their own left-minded positions, would they win? (And I’m not sure how they could even do that.)

personality Trumps policy for low(false)-information voters

Why aren't the dems screaming voting fraud today? It would be working/acceptable if Trump was, why not give it a try?

because it is the party of ethics and character, relatively speaking... if it stoops to the lows of MAGA, it will risk losing the support of the decent people of the world still remaining

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Honestly I think dems will be in pretty good shape in 4 years. Biden will almost certainly be dead, Pelosi and Schumer almost certainly will, and their might be an opportunity for a revitalized dem party that maybe goes back to being pro-union or something.

But they gotta drop all that woke shit. And I don't know if they can. The mindworm has dug deep.

they'll win in 2028 by default, almost how Biden won in 2020. but like 2024, in 2032 they'll use 2028 as a mandate and forget the past mistakes and go on to lose.

BurtReynolds wrote:

tree_ wrote:

warehouse wrote:do the dems need to appeal to middle class white people on twitter more? is that why she lost?

are you kidding? Musk made Twitter MAGA central

He simply removed the censor's hand from the scale and allowed reality to become visible. Whether you choose to look at it is not in his power.

you cannot actually believe that.. jfc

tree_ wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

tree_ wrote:

warehouse wrote:do the dems need to appeal to middle class white people on twitter more? is that why she lost?

are you kidding? Musk made Twitter MAGA central

He simply removed the censor's hand from the scale and allowed reality to become visible. Whether you choose to look at it is not in his power.

you cannot actually believe that.. jfc

Has anyone heard from Sam Harris this morning? He may need to be put in a straight jacket.

BurtReynolds wrote:

tree_ wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

tree_ wrote:

warehouse wrote:do the dems need to appeal to middle class white people on twitter more? is that why she lost?

are you kidding? Musk made Twitter MAGA central

He simply removed the censor's hand from the scale and allowed reality to become visible. Whether you choose to look at it is not in his power.

you cannot actually believe that.. jfc

Has anyone heard from Sam Harris this morning? He may need to be put in a straight jacket.

You know nothing about Sam Harris. Keep his name out yo mouth

BurtReynolds wrote:has she conceded yet?

Nov 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris will deliver a speech conceding defeat in the presidential election to Donald Trump at 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Wednesday, two sources told Reuters.

btw we were lying about Project 2025. It is real and has been activated. True American patriots: execute your orders.

4/5 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:has she conceded yet?

Nov 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris will deliver a speech conceding defeat in the presidential election to Donald Trump at 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Wednesday, two sources told Reuters.

Weird to wait for prime time...but could be a good idea.

Chris_H_2 wrote:one of the best campaign ads i saw this election cycle was one that ran in the last two weeks (especially in swing states). it was about how kamala is more concerned with things like having men who have had gender-altering surgery compete in women's sports. it ended with: "she's looking out for they/them. he's looking out for you." disgusting and transphobic? you bet. but effective? no doubt.

kamala had absolutely zero message or response. to be sure, it didn't lose her the election. but it was a good example of the things that the Democrats aren't in a position or prepared to address. so they dismiss it as identity politics that don't move the needle.

Oh yeah, her ad campaign was weak as fuck.

I can't understand why nobody has bothered to do split-screens of Trump actually speaking and blatantly lying and deceiving, contradicting something he said the day before, flip-flopping disingenuously, trolling, etc. It wouldn't be difficult at all to demonstrate what a dishonest phony he is and what his real plans are, in lieu of the Fox News cult bubble and straight from his own mouth. You could use his social media comments too.

But they're more concerned with calling him a meanie. And then when he's done being a meanie, he copies off them and says he's going to do what they're actually proposing to do. Then when he doesn't, he blames it on some invented necessity caused by Democrats and all is forgiven. Round and round.

Try the more important and tangibly irrefutable con-man angle, shitheads.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tree_ wrote:

wease wrote:If the democrats ran someone as vile and loathsome as Trump but with their own left-minded positions, would they win? (And I’m not sure how they could even do that.)

personality Trumps policy for low(false)-information voters

Why aren't the dems screaming voting fraud today? It would be working/acceptable if Trump was, why not give it a try?

They lost too badly maybe? They did claim election interference from Russia in 2016.

BurtReynolds wrote:

4/5 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:has she conceded yet?

Nov 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris will deliver a speech conceding defeat in the presidential election to Donald Trump at 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Wednesday, two sources told Reuters.

Weird to wait for prime time...but could be a good idea.

Six is not prime time.

A little weird to wait, but I think as long as it is today it's good.

Happy Trees wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:one of the best campaign ads i saw this election cycle was one that ran in the last two weeks (especially in swing states). it was about how kamala is more concerned with things like having men who have had gender-altering surgery compete in women's sports. it ended with: "she's looking out for they/them. he's looking out for you." disgusting and transphobic? you bet. but effective? no doubt.

kamala had absolutely zero message or response. to be sure, it didn't lose her the election. but it was a good example of the things that the Democrats aren't in a position or prepared to address. so they dismiss it as identity politics that don't move the needle.

Oh yeah, her ad campaign was weak as fuck.

I can't understand why nobody has bothered to do split-screens of Trump actually speaking and blatantly lying and deceiving, contradicting something he said the day before, flip-flopping disingenuously, trolling, etc. It wouldn't be difficult at all to demonstrate what a dishonest phony he is and what his real plans are, in lieu of the Fox News cult bubble and straight from his own mouth. You could use his social media comments too.

But they're more concerned with calling him a meanie. And then when he's done being a meanie, he copies off them and says he's going to do what they're actually proposing to do. Then when he doesn't, he blames it on some invented necessity caused by Democrats and all is forgiven. Round and round.

Try the more important and tangibly irrefutable con-man angle, shitheads.

That's the same as "calling him a meanie"

So all of his criminal stuff goes away now, right? And i wonder how quickly he’ll pardon all of the January 6 convicts?

Also before anyone asks, yes there’s 3 people I’ve called the hard R N word in my life; Clarence Thomas, Herman Cain and some fucking idiot like 20 years ago when I was a shithead teenager. And no I don’t feel bad about it either.

E.H. Ruddock wrote: And i wonder how quickly he’ll pardon all of the January 6 convicts?

Hopefully day 1. The sentences handed to them were barbaric, and much more severe than those handed to the people who participated during the months of race riots across the country the year before. They are political prisoners, plain and simple. Apply the punishments equally or not at all.