Re: Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood
Posted: Mon January 13, 2020 7:30 pm
Sometimes we fill in the blanks with our own perspective and sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
I agree with this.tragabigzanda wrote:1. Identifying the sentiment is not the same as supporting itOrpheus wrote:What is actually worth fighting against in the PC/MeToo movements? I see this sentiment all the time, and it's really dumb. "Yeah man, fuck these women for...talking about how they want justice for being assaulted. Not in MY country!" Especially in a movie about essentially retconning the murder of Sharon fucking Tate???
I honestly struggle to figure out what the fuck some of yall are talking about.
2. I think the sentiment is less about sticking it to women or PC police, and more about making the art you want to make regardless of social trends
Yeah I was talking about his perspective. Whether one agrees with it or not is up to them, but these things were definitely present in the movie.tragabigzanda wrote:1. Identifying the sentiment is not the same as supporting itOrpheus wrote:What is actually worth fighting against in the PC/MeToo movements? I see this sentiment all the time, and it's really dumb. "Yeah man, fuck these women for...talking about how they want justice for being assaulted. Not in MY country!" Especially in a movie about essentially retconning the murder of Sharon fucking Tate???
I honestly struggle to figure out what the fuck some of yall are talking about.
2. I think the sentiment is less about sticking it to women or PC police, and more about making the art you want to make regardless of social trends
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
I think it was at Cannes where some NYT journo went on a long winded rant disguised as a (unanswerable) question, and after she was through with her soapbox, his only answer was "I reject your hypothesis" while Robbie just smiled, which was the prefect response. It's made funnier by the headlines afterwards that read "TARANTINO SNAPS AT JOURNALIST", which was so blatantly false.tragabigzanda wrote:what's this now?BurtReynolds wrote:I wouldn't say the movie is specifically about #metoo, though he did catch a lot of flack during that (whether it was deserved or not I can't say for sure). It did motivate him here to some degree.
But it's more general than that. Pitt is raw masculine energy from start to finish, and he's surrounded by ressentiment fueled haters and inauthentic fakes who he easily overwhelms, and his world (and Tate) is better off for it. He's total Nietzschean ubermensch. It's a static character "arc" done right.
It happened after the movie came out, but I think Tarantino's response to that idiot journalist who accused him of misogyny for not giving Robbie enough speaking parts perfectly encapsulates his viewpoint, and that's reflected in the movie.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
this works after multiple viewings for metragabigzanda wrote:I agree having Kurt narrate the last stretch felt kind of funny.
Yeah, I got this vibe.BurtReynolds wrote:But it's more general than that. Pitt is raw masculine energy from start to finish, and he's surrounded by ressentiment fueled haters and inauthentic fakes who he easily overwhelms, and his world (and Tate) is better off for it. He's total Nietzschean ubermensch. It's a static character "arc" done right.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.