Re: New songs at soundcheck
Posted: Tue July 16, 2013 2:44 pm
It's the oddest thing but I really hear Soundgarden in this. Something like Tighter and Tighter.
Guess you guys missed this tweetThejambi wrote:Depends on if there is someone relayingharmless wrote:By the way, when do we usually get setlists posted up? Is it always after the gig? We'll know then whether this song was played.
I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
lasers can never be dull, guymym23 wrote:
Speed of Sound is dull as shit
Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
I'm not wrong, I just have a different opinion.harmless wrote:Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
one can always speculateJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
mym23 wrote:I'm not wrong, I just have a different opinion.harmless wrote:Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.
Seriously though, you think "speed of sound" is an interesting and good song? I think I've listened to the Backspacer version of that song twice. The Ed demo that came out was a little better, but it's really an awful, boring song that goes nowhere.harmless wrote:mym23 wrote:I'm not wrong, I just have a different opinion.harmless wrote:Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.![]()
HardTI wrote:Can someone tell me around what time of the song they hear strings? I need to really focus and try to hear it.
mym23 wrote:Seriously though, you think "speed of sound" is an interesting and good song? I think I've listened to the Backspacer version of that song twice. The Ed demo that came out was a little better, but it's really an awful, boring song that goes nowhere.harmless wrote:mym23 wrote:I'm not wrong, I just have a different opinion.harmless wrote:Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.![]()
In that last minute its sounds like some hard, driving strings, reminiscent of Kashmir. Not 100%, but pretty sure they are there.HardTI wrote:Can someone tell me around what time of the song they hear strings? I need to really focus and try to hear it.
Yes I do think it's an interesting and good song. It's not thoroughly complex and it's quiet, slow and mellow. It doesn't go anywhere but does it need to? It's an acoustic country song and I guess I don't expect those to go anywhere groundbreaking. Production issues and instrumental choices aside, I like the song.mym23 wrote:Seriously though, you think "speed of sound" is an interesting and good song? I think I've listened to the Backspacer version of that song twice. The Ed demo that came out was a little better, but it's really an awful, boring song that goes nowhere.harmless wrote:mym23 wrote:I'm not wrong, I just have a different opinion.harmless wrote:Wrong. It's weird on the album but not dull.mym23 wrote:Speed of Sound is dull as shitJaeti wrote:I'm re-listening, and I'm fantasizing. Wish I wasn't, but I can't help it. If only I could something else.mastaflatch wrote:yeah, my feeling is that the upper-register arrangements (guitar, vocals, keys, strings) will make it awesome or drawn-out. PJ never made a dull song imo (bad songs, yes, but not dull ones) so i'm fairly optimistic this will turn out good. it's just too basic at the moment for me to judge or fantisize further than this. and i have no urge to listen to it again as it is.harmless wrote:I'm surprised that you're the first person to say 'dull', actually. It's slow and plodding, and I don't think that takes away the chance of it being awesome but I'm tempering expectations because of that.mastaflatch wrote:in fact, i don't hear much going on in that song - pretty dull thing but of course, it lacks crucial elements. i'm curious at best, not really enthusiastic.![]()