Re: Waiting For Stevie
Posted: Thu May 09, 2024 9:53 pm
Seven O'Clock at the 4:13 mark.stip wrote:I agree Clem, but that was also a serious question.
Is it In Hiding? Does he hold any of the Gone's for a while?
Seven O'Clock at the 4:13 mark.stip wrote:I agree Clem, but that was also a serious question.
Is it In Hiding? Does he hold any of the Gone's for a while?
Jorge wrote:I'm sorry Stip but this is one of the straight-up dumbest things I've ever read here. Think about what you're saying for a minute. The complaints about the songwriting are really complaints about Eddie's voice.stip wrote:If you still like how Eddie sounds you'll still like pearl jam. If you don't like how he's aged he won't. Almost every other complaint (ESPECIALLY the songwriting/creativity ones) are just dancing around this
Maybe you perceive Pearl Jam songs as merely serviceable delivery methods for soaring Eddie Vedder vocal performances, much like a corn chip is a serviceable delivery method for dip. But that's definitely not the case for everybody here.
that is an impressive pull of a nine year old thread. And for many many people, thats something eddie does better than just about anyone, and is absolutely a draw and a good in itself. even if the song around it is kinda lame at least they elevate that momentBirds in Hell wrote:Whenever mention is made of 'soaring Eddie Vedder vocals' as being desirable in and of themselves, I think of this exchange and Jorge's corn chip simile (yes, I've thought it about it a lot in recent weeks):
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... ip#p542286
Jorge wrote:I'm sorry Stip but this is one of the straight-up dumbest things I've ever read here. Think about what you're saying for a minute. The complaints about the songwriting are really complaints about Eddie's voice.stip wrote:If you still like how Eddie sounds you'll still like pearl jam. If you don't like how he's aged he won't. Almost every other complaint (ESPECIALLY the songwriting/creativity ones) are just dancing around this
Maybe you perceive Pearl Jam songs as merely serviceable delivery methods for soaring Eddie Vedder vocal performances, much like a corn chip is a serviceable delivery method for dip. But that's definitely not the case for everybody here.
To be clear, I didn't drag that quote back up with any ill intent. It's just lived rent free in my head for almost a decade, reasserting itself whenever appropriate, and I felt it was finally worth hunting down the original post.stip wrote:that is an impressive pull of a nine year old thread. And for many many people, thats something eddie does better than just about anyone, and is absolutely a draw and a good in itself. even if the song around it is kinda lame at least they elevate that momentBirds in Hell wrote:Whenever mention is made of 'soaring Eddie Vedder vocals' as being desirable in and of themselves, I think of this exchange and Jorge's corn chip simile (yes, I've thought it about it a lot in recent weeks):
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... ip#p542286
Jorge wrote:I'm sorry Stip but this is one of the straight-up dumbest things I've ever read here. Think about what you're saying for a minute. The complaints about the songwriting are really complaints about Eddie's voice.stip wrote:If you still like how Eddie sounds you'll still like pearl jam. If you don't like how he's aged he won't. Almost every other complaint (ESPECIALLY the songwriting/creativity ones) are just dancing around this
Maybe you perceive Pearl Jam songs as merely serviceable delivery methods for soaring Eddie Vedder vocal performances, much like a corn chip is a serviceable delivery method for dip. But that's definitely not the case for everybody here.
exhibit a: chorus of gone
but i recognize not for everyone here. its a big tent. It's no different than the sub section of fans who have the same reaction to a song that appears in 13/4 time or whatever
96583UP wrote:3 days later i woke up and there was this riff in my head
i think i knew where it was from