Interstellar (Nolan)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by dprival78 »

spike wrote:here's a picture of matthew mcconaughey wearing orange

Image
Image
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Orpheus »

I enjoyed it, but it definitely has some issues. Late era Nolan has a bad habit of letting his plot strings show in a really obvious way. I had this same issue with The Dark Knight. There are parts where it's just kind of obvious that something was put in just to move the plot forward without a lot of thought as to how it integrates into the movie as a whole. It's kind of maddening too, because he'll have expertly constructed portions of the movie with these weird dips in between. It's most likely just a side effect of trying to to something really ambitious that has to get from point A to Z, but it bothers me nonetheless.

Overall though, I really liked it. Nolan is kind of becoming the George Lucas of the 2000's (in a good way). Big, high concept movies that still have heart behind them. A very hard thing to do.
User avatar
Malloy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2865
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Malloy »

i'm sorry i couldn't tell if you really wanted an answer. i kind have this belief that if never punctuate the moments in your life, if you kind of leave it all open and at the same time do what you can to add to the chaos, then it will become more rich and even possibly eventually all come together in some cases. i'm not really at any place where i wanna say "alright, let's start saving up for a house, i just wanna keep throwing things in the pot until it's pretty hard for anyone to tell what we're dealing with. of course i do have revelations about the whole thing but it's never close to enough and wouldn't satisfy really anyone else. chaos theories of some sort. sometimes there aren't casual ways of saying complex things too which doesn't seem so impossible to understand for me
Jorge wrote:I remember I was in Miami when it happened. I was posting from the balcony of my apartment overlooking the beach. And I was having an argument with Adamdude.
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Alex »

Malloy wrote:i'm sorry i couldn't tell if you really wanted an answer. i kind have this belief that if never punctuate the moments in your life, if you kind of leave it all open and at the same time do what you can to add to the chaos, then it will become more rich and even possibly eventually all come together in some cases. i'm not really at any place where i wanna say "alright, let's start saving up for a house, i just wanna keep throwing things in the pot until it's pretty hard for anyone to tell what we're dealing with. of course i do have revelations about the whole thing but it's never close to enough and wouldn't satisfy really anyone else. chaos theories of some sort. sometimes there aren't casual ways of saying complex things too which doesn't seem so impossible to understand for me
10/10
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by bodysnatcher »

spike wrote: no intelligent lifeforms on distant planets
actually there were
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Jorge »

After finally watching it this morning, I find myself somewhat unsteadily in the pro-Interstellar camp. It's a slog at times, and it clearly lays out Nolan's weaknesses as a craftsman, but also his potential. It's a frustrating film punctuated with moments of true beauty and some stunning Borgesian imagery (I find it surprising that not a lot of reviewers are pointing out the Borges influences-- he's all over this film).
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by EJ »

will finally be seeing this on 70 mm IMAX tomorrow.
User avatar
Bob Loblaw
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:05 pm
Location: Montreal, QC
Contact:

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Bob Loblaw »

theplatypus wrote:After finally watching it this morning, I find myself somewhat unsteadily in the pro-Interstellar camp. It's a slog at times, and it clearly lays out Nolan's weaknesses as a craftsman, but also his potential. It's a frustrating film punctuated with moments of true beauty and some stunning Borgesian imagery (I find it surprising that not a lot of reviewers are pointing out the Borges influences-- he's all over this film).
He would've loved that physical representation of time.
chud wrote:Posting! Glorious posting!
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Alex »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
theplatypus wrote:After finally watching it this morning, I find myself somewhat unsteadily in the pro-Interstellar camp. It's a slog at times, and it clearly lays out Nolan's weaknesses as a craftsman, but also his potential. It's a frustrating film punctuated with moments of true beauty and some stunning Borgesian imagery (I find it surprising that not a lot of reviewers are pointing out the Borges influences-- he's all over this film).
He would've loved that physical representation of time.
how do you know?
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by EJ »

Orpheus wrote:I enjoyed it, but it definitely has some issues. Late era Nolan has a bad habit of letting his plot strings show in a really obvious way. I had this same issue with The Dark Knight. There are parts where it's just kind of obvious that something was put in just to move the plot forward without a lot of thought as to how it integrates into the movie as a whole. It's kind of maddening too, because he'll have expertly constructed portions of the movie with these weird dips in between. It's most likely just a side effect of trying to to something really ambitious that has to get from point A to Z, but it bothers me nonetheless.

Overall though, I really liked it. Nolan is kind of becoming the George Lucas of the 2000's (in a good way). Big, high concept movies that still have heart behind them. A very hard thing to do.
This is pretty much where I am after seeing this today. Despite some of the maddening scenes and ideas, overall I did really enjoy it.

Oh, and I coincidentally had corn chowder later on with my lunch. Subliminal message or not?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Sitting in theater waiting for this to start. Sure hope LV is wrong and the slight majority here is right on this one.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by LetMeSleep »

Put your phone away, man. Loathed will be livid.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Doesn't start for another twenty minutes. Putting away now. Don't say anything bad about me for the next three hours, LMS
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

LetMeSleep wrote:Put your phone away, man. Loathed will be livid.
:lol:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I give it a C+/B-

Pros:
The cinematography was great. All the vast space scenes, the wormhole, the black hole, and the planets were all beautiful.

Matt McConaghey was excellent. This dude has really grown on me as of late. Great performance.

Matt Damon. Small part but he took advantage of it.

The score. The score itself was really good. I have some issues with the use of it though.

Cons:
Plot timing. More time should have been spent on the transition from farmer to orbiting Saturn and less time on that damn docking sequence.

Anne Hathaway. That love speech was the worst thing I've ever seen in a movie. It really ruined that whole portion of the movie for me because it pissed me off. She's horrible in this movie.

I'm no physicist, but pretty sure boosters from two small craft are not enough to escape the gravitational pull of a black hole.

Also, on some of the vast space scenes it would have been more effective with silence instead of dramatic music.

Aside from Hathaway I enjoyed it.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:That love speech was the worst thing I've ever seen in a movie. It really ruined that whole portion of the movie for me because it pissed me off. She's horrible in this movie.
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by Jorge »

That speech was definitely dumb as a poop.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by @SkitchP »

Given your facebook post about it, Im surprised Mr. Paaks didnt just tell you everything that happens before you saw it.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

@SkitchP wrote:Given your facebook post about it, Im surprised Mr. Paaks didnt just tell you everything that happens before you saw it.
Ha, yeah. That guy didn't come over to the new board, did he?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45832
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Post by BurtReynolds »

theplatypus wrote:That speech was definitely dumb as a poop.
She sounded like she had a time limit to spout all her lines.


Can we talk about Nolan's bizarre score volume in his movies? I guess he does it on purpose? Wtf? I know none of the dialogue that was drowned out in this one was important, but its still weird. It doesn't seem to add anything.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Post Reply