Red Mosquito

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

That's just how stip rolls.

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

I'm just here for the hot girls thread in GD

stupidmop wrote:That's just how stip rolls.

Totally.

What complicates it more is that I basically agree with nothing he says regarding the band.

Another thing this video continues i s the Peter Gabriel-esque stop-motion animation stuff from LW, although that was more overt.

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

After the appropriate amount of deliberation:

Spoiler: show

Yield and No Code

verb_to_trust wrote:What complicates it more is that I basically agree with nothing he says regarding the band.

But do you agree on hot girls?

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

After the appropriate amount of deliberation:

Spoiler: show

Yield and No Code

Sounds good. We'll see you in those threads.

Lament wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:What complicates it more is that I basically agree with nothing he says regarding the band.

But do you agree on hot girls?

For the most part......although once in a while someone sneaks in a heavily tattooed woman and that has always been a turn off for me.

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

After the appropriate amount of deliberation:

Spoiler: show

Yield and No Code

Sounds good. We'll see you in those threads.

You kicking me out Jack?

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

After the appropriate amount of deliberation:

Spoiler: show

Yield and No Code

Sounds good. We'll see you in those threads.

You kicking me out Jack?

Why, what would ever make you think such a thing?

Spoiler: show

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get it

Just whenever you get a minute tell us the approved list of what we're supposed to dissect and not dissect about pearl jam on the pearl jam message board you frequent all the time.

After the appropriate amount of deliberation:

Spoiler: show

Yield and No Code

Sounds good. We'll see you in those threads.

You kicking me out Jack?

Why, what would ever make you think such a thing?

Spoiler: show

stip wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

Its looks like some old guys rocking in front of a video projector stolen from the band of college kids who play the bar down my street. I understand the images aren't random, but thematically aren't we hovering somewhere around high school art class here? If Pearl Jam isn't putting that much thought into this stuff, why should we?

stip wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

But I will say that I don't think whatever statement the video may be making has any baring on the song, itself. At least, not in this case. The song is still about what it is about. This video doesn't shed new light on its meaning. Or expand the context of the story.

verb_to_trust wrote:

stip wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

Its looks like some old guys rocking in front of a video projector stolen from the band of college kids who play the bar down my street. I understand the images aren't random, but thematically aren't we hovering somewhere around high school art class here? If Pearl Jam isn't putting that much thought into this stuff, why should we?

Well, exactly. If this is what you think, why bother? There's a hot girls thread to frequent.

the videos got almost 100k views already.

I listened to MYM a few times the week it released but have been avoiding it since. It was nice coming back to it. think i'll really enjoy it in the long run

verb_to_trust wrote:

stip wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

Its looks like some old guys rocking in front of a video projector stolen from the band of college kids who play the bar down my street. I understand the images aren't random, but thematically aren't we hovering somewhere around high school art class here?

if you read that article someone posted earlier you'd know that we're at kickstarter level!

evenslow wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

stip wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:How is the review of the video on the front page longer than one paragraph? Do we really think this was some sort of statement? Or even particularly well thought out?

imagine the idea that art might have a message or that music has a meaning, or that a video full of social commentary might have tried to make a statement. I mean, that's just fucking crazy...

Its looks like some old guys rocking in front of a video projector stolen from the band of college kids who play the bar down my street. I understand the images aren't random, but thematically aren't we hovering somewhere around high school art class here? If Pearl Jam isn't putting that much thought into this stuff, why should we?

Well, exactly. If this is what you think, why bother? There's a hot girls thread to frequent.

Why can't I hang around and be negative? You know, differing perspectives and all?

I never even said the video was that bad, I just don't think there is really anything to analyze.