Red Mosquito

Higgs wrote:Yep, I should have removed the word "black" from my post. I misread 4/5's post I quoted. I was only talking misogyny here.

Joe and the Hoe gotta go.

Higgs wrote:

Higgs wrote:Yep, I should have removed the word "black" from my post. I misread 4/5's post I quoted. I was only talking misogyny here.

Joe and the Hoe gotta go.

Fuck me. And I missed that it was Chris' post I quoted, not 4/5's. Getting my threads confused. Insomnia is killing me atm.

B wrote:I don't let the fact that Harris was black was a factor at all. But I've worked for decades in an industry dominated by women and seen so many men wash out because they couldn't handle a female supervisor. you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.
.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

No, yeah, shame on her for not prioritizing a group of people crowing "your body, my choice" and thirsting for Handmaid's Tale rape squads! How dare she!

Chris_H_2 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

No, yeah, shame on her for not prioritizing a group of people crowing "your body, my choice" and thirsting for Handmaid's Tale rape squads! How dare she!

oh for god's sake, stop. there's a big difference between paying attention to someone and prioritizing them.

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

No, yeah, shame on her for not prioritizing a group of people crowing "your body, my choice" and thirsting for Handmaid's Tale rape squads! How dare she!

oh for god's sake, stop. there's a big difference between paying attention to someone and prioritizing them.

That's your takeaway?

B wrote: Poor guys. Pretty lady wouldn't kiss their ass!

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

No, yeah, shame on her for not prioritizing a group of people crowing "your body, my choice" and thirsting for Handmaid's Tale rape squads! How dare she!

oh for god's sake, stop. there's a big difference between paying attention to someone and prioritizing them.

That's your takeaway?

epilogue wrote:It would be so rad if was nonsense. Your team is hungry, boy. Promises were made. They demand action.

They aren't being especially subtle or quiet about it either.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

B wrote:you will never convince me that there was a huge proportion of men that couldn't stomach voting for a woman.

you know what didn't help? harris completely refusing to engage them. she took for granted that they fall into one of four camps: (1) republicans who will never vote for her; (2) trump supporters who will never vote for her; (3) democrats that she just assumed would vote for her; and (4) anti-trumpers that she just assumed would vote for her. so there was very little to no outreach. what her campaign seemed to fail to grasp is that there was more nuance to latter two categories rather than a simple, clean, demarcated break from the first two categories.

stuff like refusing the invitation to go on joe rogan's podcast that is majority white dudes just proves that this demographic wasn't prioritized.

No, yeah, shame on her for not prioritizing a group of people crowing "your body, my choice" and thirsting for Handmaid's Tale rape squads! How dare she!

oh for god's sake, stop. there's a big difference between paying attention to someone and prioritizing them.

That's your takeaway?

what should my takeaway be from your condescending post that didn't address the bigger point?

BurtReynolds wrote:

epilogue wrote:It would be so rad if was nonsense. Your team is hungry, boy. Promises were made. They demand action.

They aren't being especially subtle or quiet about it either.

Like, how does one even begin to respond to something this crazy?

Higgs wrote:

4/5 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

4/5 wrote:....but he doesn't set interest rates.

You already forget his last term, I see.

That he wanted to fire the Fed Chairman when the Fed raised rates? Or something else?

Wasn't that solely because it was coming up to the 2020 election though? So he thought it made him look bad to the voters. I don't think he gave much of a fuck other than that. Or am I misremembering?