Page 197 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed July 03, 2024 5:32 pm
by Bi_3
McParadigm wrote:Bi_3 wrote:If Biden were to walk out of the white house and shoot dead a reporter asking him an embarrassing question because if he is humiliated he is less likely to command respect in Congress and thus less effective as an executive and commander in chief, do you honestly believe that this ruling somehow absolves him of the crime?
Let’s try a different one.
Suppose that it is early January, 2020 again. The President of the United States says “All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they're doing,” and then says that he has received briefings as President that lead him to believe the election results are not valid.
Suppose that he had a “yes man“ Attorney General who issued a statement saying “the office of the Attorney General agrees with the President’s summation of the situation, and hopes that the American people will remain calm and continue to support the Office of the President in the swift resolution of this matter in the name of democracy.”
Suppose the President had staffed most department leadership with simpering “yes men” as well, and they were quick to express their support even as he began calling for the arrest of his opponent.
How on earth would you ever prove for a fact that the president was misrepresenting the situation in order to stay in power, in this case, and not executing what they thought was an essential protective measure against election interference.
How would you have done that before the ruling?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue July 16, 2024 9:36 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:
"Hello, Seal Team Six?"
Hmmm……
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed July 17, 2024 4:03 am
by spike
blow it up joe
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 5:40 pm
by B
Got a little backlogged there, Bi_3. The joke was pretty irrelevant by July 16th.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu July 25, 2024 4:48 pm
by 4/5
Newsome orders California officials to clear homeless encampments.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu July 25, 2024 5:03 pm
by simple schoolboy
4/5 wrote:Newsome orders California officials to clear homeless encampments.
I'm sure the ACLU is going to be filing and getting injunctions all over the place.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu November 14, 2024 2:43 pm
by warehouse
how long until they allow religious stuff in public schools? end of next year?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu November 14, 2024 2:55 pm
by Peeps
warehouse wrote:how long until they allow religious stuff in public schools? end of next year?
cant wait until some satanist kids demand their worship time and 10 commandments posted
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed December 04, 2024 2:23 pm
by 4/5
Could have put this in the transgender rights thread but any chance to bump this thread. The Court is going to hear a case on Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors today. Should start at 10 am if anybody's interested.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed December 04, 2024 4:38 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 12:44 pm
by B
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.

Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 1:02 pm
by wease
B wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.

Did you read that correctly?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 1:45 pm
by B
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 1:45 pm
by B
better?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 2:57 pm
by wease
I dunno. Maybe? Maybe I’m not reading it right.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 3:56 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
His shock is sarcastic
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 4:31 pm
by wease
I considered that. But with B, it’s always a question.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 9:03 pm
by B
I had to go deep cut with the arrow for sarcasm.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 9:05 pm
by B
Props to Jackson for pointing out that Republicans are happy for cis gendered kids to get treatment that affirms their gender.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu December 05, 2024 9:06 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:Props to Jackson for pointing out that Republicans are happy for cis gendered kids to get treatment that affirms their gender.
Yeah, that didnt happen.