Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

When a band is but a fraction of Pearl Jam, but they aren't zero Pearl Jam.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:"Yonks ago" will now be part of my vocabulary. Many, many, many years equals a yonk. Yonks ago Jimmy Carter had an oil problem.
How ya be ya people of the sea. It's been yonks since we've seen ya.
"Sea" and "ya" don't rhyme, Pete.
I know that, Joey.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by bodysnatcher »

if you idiots don't stop talking like ye, i'll throw you in the sea
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by epilogue »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:"Yonks ago" will now be part of my vocabulary. Many, many, many years equals a yonk. Yonks ago Jimmy Carter had an oil problem.
How ya be ya people of the sea. It's been yonks since we've seen ya.
"Sea" and "ya" don't rhyme, Pete.
I know that, Joey.
Fucking good
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by epilogue »

bodysnatcher wrote:if you idiots don't stop talking like ye, i'll throw you in the sea
Yay!
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

guys, i was quoting eddie vedder
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by epilogue »

cutuphalfdead wrote:guys, i was quoting eddie vedder
Shut the fuck up
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

durdencommatyler wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:guys, i was quoting eddie vedder
Shut the fuck up
joey i swear to god
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by McParadigm »

Wait I think he’s right
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

Fine bunch of wankers.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by dimejinky99 »

I knew the quote. From an Australian gig in 95
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

98
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by dimejinky99 »

It was 95

Triple j concert. 17 March 95
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Norah »

No it was March 5 1998. Also on Triple J.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by epilogue »

bunch of fucking nerds
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by dimejinky99 »

Well I’ll be damned. I don’t remember any no code songs on that set or yield.

But I haven’t heard it in years
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Kevin Davis »

McParadigm wrote:I liked the muffled recordings that came out yonks ago better than the album. At heart, those are crooning songs, and his modern hiccupy singing does them no favors. Also, there’s really no reason to keep them uke-only, other than that it gave the project a theme that was comfortably creatively limiting, and served to keep it from requiring much effort beyond “relearn these old songs.”

Not that I want all those songs to get band treatments, but none of them are *served* by the complete lack of support. A gentle bit of piano on Without You would have been nice, for example. Light touch stuff...Love Love Love, Idylls of the King, and Game Shows Touch Our Lives by The Mountain Goats come to mind.
A lot of those songs were played for what I believe was the first time at a weird one-off solo show at UCLA in early 2002 (I think it was the All Tomorrow's Parties festival). It was about an hour-long set, comprised partially of these songs and partially of songs that would end up on "Riot Act" (all of which were more or less "new songs" at the time). Not sure if this is the "muffled recording" you're referring to, but the recording of this show was my introduction to a lot of these songs and yes, those performances are better. Eddie's voice was ten years younger, the songs were fresher, and the ambiance in the room was more natural, making the takes feel a bit less stilted -- in my opinion, not an uncommon discrepancy between live EV/PJ and studio EV/PJ in general.

That said, I think the songs are almost uniformly strong -- harmonically, melodically, and stylistically unique items in EV/PJ canon, some of them among the more compositionally compelling things Eddie has written from a strictly nuts-and-bolts, chords-and-melodies perspective. That there is no "reason" for it to be an all-uke album just feels like the kind of statement that could apply to any project that imposes this type of superficial limitation on itself, and the idea that it was left as such more or less out of laziness is just a regurgitation of the default criticism leveled at all modern Pearl Jam-related things -- they don't want to put any effort into anything, moneygrab, etc. Fair in general considering the evidence, but not the case in every individual circumstance and in my opinion not the case here -- these songs were conceived of and composed this way, at a time when Eddie was engrossed in the instrument as a musical tool, admittedly pushing it beyond its functional utility for the sake of the creative exercise, one which is perhaps doomed to result in a project of limited appeal and scope but is nevertheless a genuine reflection of its moment in time.

Of course, some of that is diluted a bit by the fact that it wasn't recorded and released until ten years after many of the songs were written, but it's also not surprising to me that the project wasn't given a lot of attention a time when Pearl Jam were on the precipice of a new album and huge tour (and were still a consistently creatively active band in general), nor is it surprising to me that he didn't try to shoehorn all of the songs into the band's repertoire -- and the fact that he didn't, over the course of the three albums that followed their inception, along with the fact that he chose to include "Can't Keep" on the uke album when it had already been effectively "used," in my mind lends credence to the idea that the uke-only arrangements were not a product of laziness but the vision for these songs, as a collective group, all along.

Ultimately, I recognize the album's limitations and appreciate the fact that someone would tire of it after a few tracks, but I like almost all of the songs and am happy they are gathered together as a collection, though a 2002 version of the same album would no doubt have been even better.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Strat »

what KD said 8-)
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28032
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by Monkey_Driven »

KD, dropping the hammer.

Well said.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by bada »

nah it sucked.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Eddie Vedder supporting The Who

Post by dimejinky99 »

I’d rather have Ukulele songs than not.

I think it’s a little gem of a record. And sat beside into the Wild it suggested a whole new field he was about to let us into to play in.

Not sure he’s confident enough to go that way just yet but I can see it happening properly in time.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
Post Reply