Re: McCartney Vs. Lennon
Posted: Sun June 23, 2013 12:16 am
No harm in stating a preference, guys.
theplatypus wrote:No harm in stating a preference, guys.
did you?theplatypus wrote:I know what you mean, in that he's sometimes dismissed as the dorky, "poppy" Beatle, but it's important to remember that he's also one of the most successful and celebrated songwriters in modern music. I wouldn't call him an "unsung hero".Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think McCartney is an unsung hero.
Paul was the best Beatle, but in my opinion George had the best solo album with "All Things Must Pass".
He said McCartney right there. This is a Lennon vs McCartney thread.elliseamos wrote:theplatypus wrote:No harm in stating a preference, guys.did you?theplatypus wrote:I know what you mean, in that he's sometimes dismissed as the dorky, "poppy" Beatle, but it's important to remember that he's also one of the most successful and celebrated songwriters in modern music. I wouldn't call him an "unsung hero".Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think McCartney is an unsung hero.
Paul was the best Beatle, but in my opinion George had the best solo album with "All Things Must Pass".
exactly, it's a lennon/mccartney thread and he brings up harrison. his comment about mccartney seems solely statistics based, not "preference."Mecca wrote:He said McCartney right there. This is a Lennon vs McCartney thread.elliseamos wrote:theplatypus wrote:No harm in stating a preference, guys.did you?theplatypus wrote:I know what you mean, in that he's sometimes dismissed as the dorky, "poppy" Beatle, but it's important to remember that he's also one of the most successful and celebrated songwriters in modern music. I wouldn't call him an "unsung hero".Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I think McCartney is an unsung hero.
Paul was the best Beatle, but in my opinion George had the best solo album with "All Things Must Pass".
Yes.elliseamos wrote:did you?
oh. thanks for clarifying. it seemed sort of vague... like most responses.theplatypus wrote:Yes.elliseamos wrote:did you?
i know what you're saying, but would you honestly say that bob dylan is a bad artist/songwriter just b/c jimi hendrix played all along the watchtower better?surfndestroy wrote:I can think of at least two covers of Jealous Guy that I like more than Lennon's.
Dylan, great/amazing songwriter. I wouldn't call him great in the studio and on stage some of his limitations and quirks become very apparent. I'll gladly accept Dylan's limitations to get those songs but i can't act like those limitations don't sometimes hurt the songs as presented.elliseamos wrote:i know what you're saying, but would you honestly say that bob dylan is a bad artist/songwriter just b/c jimi hendrix played all along the watchtower better?surfndestroy wrote:I can think of at least two covers of Jealous Guy that I like more than Lennon's.
so using the same thought process, just b/c elliot smith sung his song better, doesn't make john lennon a poor songwriter. glad we could clear that up.surfndestroy wrote:Dylan, great/amazing songwriter. I wouldn't call him great in the studio and on stage some of his limitations and quirks become very apparent. I'll gladly accept Dylan's limitations to get those songs but i can't act like those limitations don't sometimes hurt the songs as presented.elliseamos wrote:i know what you're saying, but would you honestly say that bob dylan is a bad artist/songwriter just b/c jimi hendrix played all along the watchtower better?surfndestroy wrote:I can think of at least two covers of Jealous Guy that I like more than Lennon's.