Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Sun July 14, 2013 12:55 am
That was my understanding.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Is that new movie "RIPD" really just MiB 4?
Red Mosquito
I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Page 3 of 4
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Sun July 14, 2013 2:20 pm
Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Mon July 15, 2013 1:14 pm
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Mon July 15, 2013 1:39 pm
You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Mon July 15, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Wed July 17, 2013 10:55 pm
Human Centipede
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 2:12 am
Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 2:21 am
Yep.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 3:26 am
Scary Movie.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 6:23 am
The Fast and Furious movies make a bit of an interesting case study on a series of movies that have gone full circle from a sequel being justifiable to absolutely not, then, somehow, justifiable again.
Fast and furious (good enough in a completely brainless way and successful enough to warrant a sequel)
2 Fast 2 Furious (hmmmm, the turd is starting to show through the polish... I'm not sure we need another one)
FF3: Tokyo Drift (oh god no, who the hell wants a sequel after Tokyo Drift?)
FF4 (huh, stupid, but I guess successful enough to make another one)
FF5 (ok, yes we need another one, if only to see how far beyond the stupid barrier we can push this thing)
FF6 (More Statham? 50km long runways.... sure, why the fuck not? We definitely need one more serve after this)
Fast and furious (good enough in a completely brainless way and successful enough to warrant a sequel)
2 Fast 2 Furious (hmmmm, the turd is starting to show through the polish... I'm not sure we need another one)
FF3: Tokyo Drift (oh god no, who the hell wants a sequel after Tokyo Drift?)
FF4 (huh, stupid, but I guess successful enough to make another one)
FF5 (ok, yes we need another one, if only to see how far beyond the stupid barrier we can push this thing)
FF6 (More Statham? 50km long runways.... sure, why the fuck not? We definitely need one more serve after this)
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 12:49 pm
No! The title doesn't specify that at all, just movies that should never have had a sequel -- either for that reason, or because they totally messed the sequels up and destroyed the legacy of the original filmcutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 1:02 pm
Yes!harmless wrote:No! The title doesn't specify that at all, just movies that should never have had a sequel -- either for that reason, or because they totally messed the sequels up and destroyed the legacy of the original filmcutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
daft twat wrote:This is exactly what I meant. Many of the sequels mentioned in this thread are hideous, but I can see why they were attempted. This, though.....who the fuck saw the first one and thought, "I would be keen on seeing what happens next to these characters"?lowlight79 wrote:The whole ten yards.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 1:17 pm
Such a retroactive "Yeah, THIS is what I meant, actually" doesn't count. I read the thread title and answered.darth_vedder wrote:Yes!harmless wrote:No! The title doesn't specify that at all, just movies that should never have had a sequel -- either for that reason, or because they totally messed the sequels up and destroyed the legacy of the original filmcutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
daft twat wrote:This is exactly what I meant. Many of the sequels mentioned in this thread are hideous, but I can see why they were attempted. This, though.....who the fuck saw the first one and thought, "I would be keen on seeing what happens next to these characters"?lowlight79 wrote:The whole ten yards.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 2:14 pm
That daft twat guy sure is a twat for causing all of this confusion. Hey Mr. Twat, next time, how about being more clear dammit!harmless wrote:Such a retroactive "Yeah, THIS is what I meant, actually" doesn't count. I read the thread title and answered.darth_vedder wrote:Yes!harmless wrote:No! The title doesn't specify that at all, just movies that should never have had a sequel -- either for that reason, or because they totally messed the sequels up and destroyed the legacy of the original filmcutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
daft twat wrote:This is exactly what I meant. Many of the sequels mentioned in this thread are hideous, but I can see why they were attempted. This, though.....who the fuck saw the first one and thought, "I would be keen on seeing what happens next to these characters"?lowlight79 wrote:The whole ten yards.
Re: I can'e believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 2:28 pm
daft twat wrote:I was pissed up.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 2:43 pm
darth_vedder wrote:That daft twat guy sure is a twat for causing all of this confusion. Hey Mr. Twat, next time, how about being more clear dammit!harmless wrote:Such a retroactive "Yeah, THIS is what I meant, actually" doesn't count. I read the thread title and answered.darth_vedder wrote:Yes!harmless wrote:No! The title doesn't specify that at all, just movies that should never have had a sequel -- either for that reason, or because they totally messed the sequels up and destroyed the legacy of the original filmcutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah, shouldn't this thread be for movies that were so bad to begin with you can't see why they'd ever want to make another?darth_vedder wrote:You're doing it wrong.harmless wrote:Jurassic Park. The first one might be my favourite movie ever and the others are shit.
daft twat wrote:This is exactly what I meant. Many of the sequels mentioned in this thread are hideous, but I can see why they were attempted. This, though.....who the fuck saw the first one and thought, "I would be keen on seeing what happens next to these characters"?lowlight79 wrote:The whole ten yards.
Incidentally, I learned the other day that I think, in the US, you pronounce 'twat' as 'twot', whereas here, it rhymes with 'that'.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 4:53 pm
Sharknado 2, just greenlit!
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 5:35 pm
Thought it appropriate.Scumbag Syfy
•SHARKNADO, 1.37 MILLION VIEWERS CONSIDERED VERY SUCCESSFUL
•WAREHOUSE 13, ON AVERAGE 2 MILLION EUREKA, ON AVERAGE 2.5 MILLION ALPHAS, ON AVERAGE 1.5 MILLION ALL OF WHICH NOT DEEMED SUCCESSFUL ENOUGH TO CONTINUE AIRING
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Thu July 18, 2013 8:43 pm
Sharknado only caught on after its original air date, though. Also it probably cost like 47 dollars to make, 25 of which went to Tara Reid.
Re: I can't believe they made a sequel to that!
Posted: Fri July 19, 2013 6:42 am
She still had to suck off the director.