Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Posted: Tue October 22, 2013 12:27 am
Don't be a jackass.ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
I honestly thought it was some weird plastic robot thing.theplatypus wrote:Don't be a jackass.ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
Fuzzcharger wrote:This outlandish claim also caught my attention. Absurdity of the highest order!Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:As much as im loving infallible, its no where near as good as tremor Christ
Tolkien describes the reproduction of saruman's uruk-hai as "they worm themselves like maggots out of the ground"McParadigm wrote:A legend is born.
the vocals, for starters.harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
Followed closely by the guitar sound.spike wrote:the vocals, for starters.harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album.stip wrote:No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
Stip only listens to Ten, Backspacer and Sirens. I find it hard to believe that he listens to No Code for any other purpose than creating content for his album reviews.Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album.stip wrote:No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
I dunno, I find it conceptually interesting but not very exciting otherwiseLament wrote:In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
It's not like they owed it to anyone to make a record like Backspacer (whether you like it or not, it was a weirdly ridiculous move)McParadigm wrote:You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
Plenty of artists build records around ideas that didnt make the previous records. These guys hold over ideas all the time. A 2007 follow-up to s/t with decent production and the broader palatte suggested by the leaked tracks/OTE could have been really, really cool.