Re: Seattle Seahawks
Posted: Mon February 03, 2014 3:11 am
I don't know, pretty sure Seattle beat Denver in every way possible.durdencommatyler wrote:I don't think Seattle can beat Denver. Only Denver can beat Denver.
I don't know, pretty sure Seattle beat Denver in every way possible.durdencommatyler wrote:I don't think Seattle can beat Denver. Only Denver can beat Denver.
They'll be able to free ride for one more season on the cheap rookie deals, but in 2015 they'll have to make some real tough decisions. Wilson will get paid big time, and that will be the benchmark for how you decide who stays and who goes. Schneider just needs to keep kicking the shit out of the draft.Bammer wrote:I'm telling you. Start paying attention. Oh and any of those free agents your team wants? They would prefer to play in Seattle.
wonderful show of class by the winner's fansBammer wrote:Haven't even looked at the 14 page Broncos thread here on RM, but....
Fuck yo Broncos thread!
Maybe just maybe a little respect now? Half our team is on tiny contracts. See you in Glendale. I predict Seahawks vs. Dolphins.
*Edit: Or the Colts.
I can understand some of Bammer's smugness right now. Teams in the Western United States typically don't get a lot of attention even when they earn it. As a Broncos fan I know this all too well. Where I think he goes wrong is taking it out on this forum. I certainly didn't disrespect the Seahawks, for one.warehouse wrote:wonderful show of class by the winner's fansBammer wrote:Haven't even looked at the 14 page Broncos thread here on RM, but....
Fuck yo Broncos thread!
Maybe just maybe a little respect now? Half our team is on tiny contracts. See you in Glendale. I predict Seahawks vs. Dolphins.
*Edit: Or the Colts.
Exactly, it was pretty even in predictions here on the board. I had Seattle winning by one point.Green Habit wrote:I can understand some of Bammer's smugness right now. Teams in the Western United States typically don't get a lot of attention even when they earn it. As a Broncos fan I know this all too well. Where I think he goes wrong is taking it out on this forum. I certainly didn't disrespect the Seahawks, for one.warehouse wrote:wonderful show of class by the winner's fansBammer wrote:Haven't even looked at the 14 page Broncos thread here on RM, but....
Fuck yo Broncos thread!
Maybe just maybe a little respect now? Half our team is on tiny contracts. See you in Glendale. I predict Seahawks vs. Dolphins.
*Edit: Or the Colts.
Now that I've calmed down a little, I will clarify. The week leading up to the game seemed to be pretty even in terms of respect, but then on Sunday morning I got pretty fired up with 90% of people picking the Broncos to win (some by a lot) and all these narratives about how Manning was "destined" or "deserved" or "supposed" to win. Lack of respect, people blindly choosing the poster child...looking at Seattle as a mere stepping stone.Self wrote:In my experience, they would prefer to play where the $ is. Especially once they have a ring.Bammer wrote:Oh and any of those free agents your team wants? They would prefer to play in Seattle.
Maybe you answered your own question.Bammer wrote: ignoring the Seahawks until I started this thread in fucking December.
/rant
Come on, the thread lengths are solely caused by the number of frequent posters unique to this forum. Look at how long the Bucs thread is as proof. For rooting for a team that just won its first Super Bowl you're still quite worked up.Bammer wrote:Oh, and I'm calling BS on this board for the fact that the Broncos thread was (is) 5 times longer than the Seahawks thread while all year we were looking at a historically good offense and a historically good defense...we all saw how that turned out yesterday...so yeah, I'm taking it out on all you clowns who thought that Denver was so great and gave them all this attention while ignoring the Seahawks until I started this thread in fucking December.
/rant
Miami Heat?red calzolaio wrote:taking less money for a chance to win???
I'm still bitter about 2005.Green Habit wrote:Come on, the thread lengths are solely caused by the number of frequent posters unique to this forum. Look at how long the Bucs thread is as proof. For rooting for a team that just won its first Super Bowl you're still quite worked up.Bammer wrote:Oh, and I'm calling BS on this board for the fact that the Broncos thread was (is) 5 times longer than the Seahawks thread while all year we were looking at a historically good offense and a historically good defense...we all saw how that turned out yesterday...so yeah, I'm taking it out on all you clowns who thought that Denver was so great and gave them all this attention while ignoring the Seahawks until I started this thread in fucking December.
/rant
Basketball your playing career is 5 years football is 3 ( on average).Bammer wrote:Miami Heat?red calzolaio wrote:taking less money for a chance to win???
The 12th man is something special. That Seattle had the owner and tax payers who care enough to design it into the stadium is special. It's a great stadium with great fans at the moment.Peeps wrote:Now enjoy your Super Bowl and quit talking like the 12th man is something special despite the specially man made stadium built to enhance the sound