Re: Lennon or McCartney
Posted: Thu December 18, 2014 7:06 pm
I wasn't talking about his vocals. I was talking about his general attitude.durdencommatyler wrote:What's an example you'd cite as completely twatty Lennon vocals?
I wasn't talking about his vocals. I was talking about his general attitude.durdencommatyler wrote:What's an example you'd cite as completely twatty Lennon vocals?
man i wish i remembered what thread that pic was in right nowmastaflatch wrote:Of course, Wendy Carlos' Twin keeps on omitting that sad episode when McCartney ate his wife's leg
malice wrote:man i wish i remembered what thread that pic was in right nowmastaflatch wrote:Of course, Wendy Carlos' Twin keeps on omitting that sad episode when McCartney ate his wife's leg
same difHeathen wrote:more like dismembering ho ho ho
Heathen wrote:more like dismembering ho ho ho
"Monkberry Moon Delight" is probably my favorite McCartney vocal -- he had a beautiful voice, yes, but he could howl too.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, no. I mean McCartney has a beautiful voice. Obviously the dude can sing. But he doesn't have that kind of raw passion, that bare nakedness and vulnerability that Lennon had. Lennon cuts your soul in half when he sings Don't Let Me Down. He ripples flesh when he sings Across the Universe. He makes you feel drunk and exhausted when he sings I'm So Tired. I don't know. He just moves me deeply when he sings. McCartney hasn't ever really moved me like that with his vocal performance. I love his voice. But it doesn't move and twitch and bewitch the way Lennon's did.Farmer John wrote:So would I if I had to choose. I'm just saying Lennon's not running away with it.durdencommatyler wrote:If you dig that sort of thing. I'll take Lennon.Farmer John wrote:Golden Slumbers disagrees.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon's voice and vocal stylings were so far above McCartney's.
Monkberry is one of my all time favorite McCartney tunes. That and Helter Skelter. Yeah, boy could wail and I LOVE that he did from time to time. But Lennon was more authentic and heartfelt in his wail. Whereas, I think McCartney was doing his best Lennon impression when he wailed.Kevin Davis wrote:"Monkberry Moon Delight" is probably my favorite McCartney vocal -- he had a beautiful voice, yes, but he could howl too.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, no. I mean McCartney has a beautiful voice. Obviously the dude can sing. But he doesn't have that kind of raw passion, that bare nakedness and vulnerability that Lennon had. Lennon cuts your soul in half when he sings Don't Let Me Down. He ripples flesh when he sings Across the Universe. He makes you feel drunk and exhausted when he sings I'm So Tired. I don't know. He just moves me deeply when he sings. McCartney hasn't ever really moved me like that with his vocal performance. I love his voice. But it doesn't move and twitch and bewitch the way Lennon's did.Farmer John wrote:So would I if I had to choose. I'm just saying Lennon's not running away with it.durdencommatyler wrote:If you dig that sort of thing. I'll take Lennon.Farmer John wrote:Golden Slumbers disagrees.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon's voice and vocal stylings were so far above McCartney's.
You are right about "Twist and Shout," though -- that's pretty tough to match as far as rock singing goes.
Totally!mastaflatch wrote:![]()
Monkberry Moon Delight is an excellent song indeed. That guy always floors me with his vocal ad-libbings - Hey Jude being the original template for this, i guess. Nineteen Hundred and Eighty Five is also pretty great.
Also, Why Don't We Do It In the Road, which a lot of people (for some reason) think is Lennon. But its McCartney. But again would he have tackled that without Lennon? Maybe not. The world is better off for having both of them.durdencommatyler wrote:Monkberry is one of my all time favorite McCartney tunes. That and Helter Skelter. Yeah, boy could wail and I LOVE that he did from time to time. But Lennon was more authentic and heartfelt in his wail. Whereas, I think McCartney was doing his best Lennon impression when he wailed.Kevin Davis wrote:"Monkberry Moon Delight" is probably my favorite McCartney vocal -- he had a beautiful voice, yes, but he could howl too.durdencommatyler wrote:Well, no. I mean McCartney has a beautiful voice. Obviously the dude can sing. But he doesn't have that kind of raw passion, that bare nakedness and vulnerability that Lennon had. Lennon cuts your soul in half when he sings Don't Let Me Down. He ripples flesh when he sings Across the Universe. He makes you feel drunk and exhausted when he sings I'm So Tired. I don't know. He just moves me deeply when he sings. McCartney hasn't ever really moved me like that with his vocal performance. I love his voice. But it doesn't move and twitch and bewitch the way Lennon's did.Farmer John wrote:So would I if I had to choose. I'm just saying Lennon's not running away with it.durdencommatyler wrote:If you dig that sort of thing. I'll take Lennon.Farmer John wrote:Golden Slumbers disagrees.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon's voice and vocal stylings were so far above McCartney's.
You are right about "Twist and Shout," though -- that's pretty tough to match as far as rock singing goes.
spike wrote:no brainer: lennon, because wings