Re: Netflix: Daredevil
Posted: Wed April 15, 2015 12:42 am
by Jorge
I skipped forward to a couple of episodes that featured Kingpin, because I wanted to see how they'd D'Onofrio would play him. He was, by far, the most engaging part of those episodes.
I'll just copy-paste the comment I left on a friend's post on FB:
I'll just copy-paste the comment I left on a friend's post on FB:
- Spoiler: show
- i like Wilson Fisk a lot. he is portrayed as a much more interesting, troubled and menacing character than I've ever seen him-- especially in the comics, where he's always sort of been treated as simply "Fat Lex Luthor". also the fight scenes are suitably brutal, and yeah, surprisingly violent for a show that's (i think) PG-13.
i kind of hate everything else... ?
i'm not sure what i was expecting, but this is yet another TV entry to the Marvel Cinematic Universe that feels a lot 'TV' and not very 'cinematic'. in terms of the construction, it feels remarkably flat to me, with a lot of very dull wide & mid shots, almost no dynamics, almost no flair or style. for a character so steeped in noir and 70s NYC crime film tropes, the straightforwardness of it feels jarring to me. this suffers from "network tv syndrome": characters standing around reciting expositional dialogue (dialogue which, to me, sounds horribly stilted and awkward for the most part). just like the horrifically mediocre Agents of SHIELD and Agent Carter, but gloomier. every episode has the budget of a small feature-- why is everything so flat and boring to look at? why did the filmmakers decide to go for such conventional, straightforward and characterless storytelling? this is after Hannibal and True Detective showed audiences that TV shows can be visually BEAUTIFUL, gripping, tense, artful, original, with bold filmmaking choices, why does this look like a TV commercial? Or worse-- Gotham? (to be fair, this show is quite a bit better than Gotham, because everything about Gotham is bad.)
and those are NETWORK shows. this is a fucking TV series on the internet. it's supposed to be unencumbered by the constraints of television-- act breaks for commercials, episode lengths. why didn't they take advantage of that? why does this feel so... ordinary?
i don't know why i haven't liked a single Marvel TV show yet, but I always watch them with an open mind and hoping for the best, because I really like their films. for a supposed "golden age of television" with shows that take a true cinematic approach to serialized storytelling... we still have a lot of stuff that seems plucked right out of 90s television. i don't know. i'll probably finish the show at some point, maybe. but mostly I'll be thinking about the many ways in which this could have been an outstanding show, instead of a merely serviceable one.