Tarantino

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47949
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

i gotcha, rudroh

i dunno, basterds didn't feel samey to me overall as django...all of his movies have very similar elements, there's no denying that
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I just wish he would scale himself back a bit. I thought JB was an exciting step in the right direction. It felt like a maturation. Then he went in the totally opposite direction afterward. :?

That said, he obviously loves what he's doing and his movies continue to be immensely popular with just about everyone on the planet, so why would he want to change?
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47949
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I just wish he would scale himself back a bit. I thought JB was an exciting step in the right direction. It felt like a maturation. Then he went in the totally opposite direction afterward. :?

That said, he obviously loves what he's doing and his movies continue to be immensely popular with just about everyone on the planet, so why would he want to change?
i think he's just one of those kid in a candy store type people...scaling down is probably incredibly hard for him to process
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Tarantino

Post by zeb »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's just fluff.
:gomez:
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

zeb wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's just fluff.
:gomez:
8-)
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Tarantino

Post by zeb »

This thread did motivate me to pull together a tidy little QT soundtrack playlist.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Is it the same song repeated over and over?
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Tarantino

Post by zeb »

No
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Tarantino

Post by Kaius »

Team Tarantino. I haven't watched Jackie Brown, but everything else is good.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Kaius wrote:Team Tarantino. I haven't watched Jackie Brown, but everything else is good.
Again, I'm NOT SAYING his movies aren't good. They are. Just for me, they all are running together, so I don't look forward to another Tarantino movie as much as I used to.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Tarantino

Post by Kaius »

I don't really look forward too movies in general. Not anymore at least.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Tarantino

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:I don't really look forward too movies in general. Not anymore at least.
Certainly not like I look forward to the new season of Mad Men (RIP :peace: ) or Game of Thrones or True Detective or whatever. But every once in a while I get pretty amped about something coming down the pike.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I just found out Boyd Crowder is in the H8teful Eight, so I'll probably go see it now. I love that guy.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by bada »

Cletus Van Dam
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11800
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Tarantino

Post by The Argonaut »

OK, so, Hateful Eight. I know I just used this criticism about David O. Russell last week, but it's true here as well: Quentin Tarantino has officially crawled all the way up his own asshole. Now, he is still a stupendously talented filmmaker, with impressive taste, and a unique vision. But I still feel like I just spent the better part of the last three hours inside a guy's ass.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by VinylGuy »

At least it was better than Django.

But yeah, is he going to make something meaningfull again? Dont think so. Seems his next proyect is kill bill 3.
:shake:
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11800
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: Tarantino

Post by The Argonaut »

This movie made me think about that, too. When did we stop needing Tarantino? I'd say after Death Proof.
One of the great things about his early movies, I'm thinking especially of Pulp Fiction, is that there were few truly evil characters. Other than in Jackie Brown, I can't think of any good guys in Tarantino movies. But there are very few purely evil characters. There's Mr. Blonde in Reservoir Dogs. In Pulp Fiction, there's Zed and his buddy. But just about every other character, despite being a criminal or corrupt or a junkie or whatever is sufficiently fleshed out and humanized so that they all become real people and all become at least mildly sympathetic.
In his last three movies, there is nothing but cruel, evil characters. He goes out of his way to create characters with only one side: cruel and evil. This movie is called Hateful Eight, even.
Tarantino famously loves exploitation and B cinema. What was so great about his early movies is that he took that aesthetic and those tricks and fleshed them out to create full, rich worlds and movies. Recently, he's just copying and cleaning up. It's essentially become a parody.
All that said, I did watch a three hour movie that did not feel like three hours, and that means something. This wasn't a bad movie. It was a cruel movie (which is sometimes OK depending on one's mood). It was perhaps an unnecessary movie, whatever that means. It doesn't add anything to my spirit and it doesn't add anything to the culture, which is probably what I mean by that. But it was fine.
I think I'm just mostly sad that this is the best he's got.
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by VinylGuy »

The Argonaut wrote:This movie made me think about that, too. When did we stop needing Tarantino? I'd say after Death Proof.
One of the great things about his early movies, I'm thinking especially of Pulp Fiction, is that there were few truly evil characters. Other than in Jackie Brown, I can't think of any good guys in Tarantino movies. But there are very few purely evil characters. There's Mr. Blonde in Reservoir Dogs. In Pulp Fiction, there's Zed and his buddy. But just about every other character, despite being a criminal or corrupt or a junkie or whatever is sufficiently fleshed out and humanized so that they all become real people and all become at least mildly sympathetic.
In his last three movies, there is nothing but cruel, evil characters. He goes out of his way to create characters with only one side: cruel and evil. This movie is called Hateful Eight, even.
Tarantino famously loves exploitation and B cinema. What was so great about his early movies is that he took that aesthetic and those tricks and fleshed them out to create full, rich worlds and movies. Recently, he's just copying and cleaning up. It's essentially become a parody.
All that said, I did watch a three hour movie that did not feel like three hours, and that means something. This wasn't a bad movie. It was a cruel movie (which is sometimes OK depending on one's mood). It was perhaps an unnecessary movie, whatever that means. It doesn't add anything to my spirit and it doesn't add anything to the culture, which is probably what I mean by that. But it was fine.
I think I'm just mostly sad that this is the best he's got.
Great post. It reminds me of something i read about a conversation between oliver stone and quentin. Seems Stone said to him " your movies are just fine, but i make films. About real things¨".

I get it now.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Tarantino

Post by BurtReynolds »

I always figured Tarantino was some kind of autistic.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Tarantino

Post by stip »

I just saw this - not his best but still enjoyable. I've read some interesting arguments about how this is about contemporary US race relations that I find pretty interesting and adds a lot of extra dimensions to the movie


It did make me excited to see Channing Tatum play gambit
Post Reply