Page 3 of 7
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:25 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
i gotcha, rudroh
i dunno, basterds didn't feel samey to me overall as django...all of his movies have very similar elements, there's no denying that
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:28 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I just wish he would scale himself back a bit. I thought JB was an exciting step in the right direction. It felt like a maturation. Then he went in the totally opposite direction afterward.
That said, he obviously loves what he's doing and his movies continue to be immensely popular with just about everyone on the planet, so why would he want to change?
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sun June 14, 2015 2:30 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I just wish he would scale himself back a bit. I thought JB was an exciting step in the right direction. It felt like a maturation. Then he went in the totally opposite direction afterward.
That said, he obviously loves what he's doing and his movies continue to be immensely popular with just about everyone on the planet, so why would he want to change?
i think he's just one of those kid in a candy store type people...scaling down is probably incredibly hard for him to process
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:06 am
by zeb
LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's just fluff.

Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:18 am
by LoathedVermin72
zeb wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's just fluff.


Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 10:11 am
by zeb
This thread did motivate me to pull together a tidy little QT soundtrack playlist.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 11:37 am
by LoathedVermin72
Is it the same song repeated over and over?
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 1:38 pm
by zeb
No
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:13 pm
by Kaius
Team Tarantino. I haven't watched Jackie Brown, but everything else is good.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:19 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Kaius wrote:Team Tarantino. I haven't watched Jackie Brown, but everything else is good.
Again, I'm NOT SAYING his movies aren't good. They are. Just for me, they all are running together, so I don't look forward to another Tarantino movie as much as I used to.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:22 pm
by Kaius
I don't really look forward too movies in general. Not anymore at least.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Mon June 15, 2015 4:38 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:I don't really look forward too movies in general. Not anymore at least.
Certainly not like I look forward to the new season of Mad Men (RIP

) or Game of Thrones or True Detective or whatever. But every once in a while I get pretty amped about something coming down the pike.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Thu December 10, 2015 3:16 am
by E.H. Ruddock
I just found out Boyd Crowder is in the H8teful Eight, so I'll probably go see it now. I love that guy.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Thu December 10, 2015 3:26 am
by bada
Cletus Van Dam
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 6:32 am
by The Argonaut
OK, so, Hateful Eight. I know I just used this criticism about David O. Russell last week, but it's true here as well: Quentin Tarantino has officially crawled all the way up his own asshole. Now, he is still a stupendously talented filmmaker, with impressive taste, and a unique vision. But I still feel like I just spent the better part of the last three hours inside a guy's ass.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 6:46 am
by VinylGuy
At least it was better than Django.
But yeah, is he going to make something meaningfull again? Dont think so. Seems his next proyect is kill bill 3.

Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 7:09 am
by The Argonaut
This movie made me think about that, too. When did we stop needing Tarantino? I'd say after Death Proof.
One of the great things about his early movies, I'm thinking especially of Pulp Fiction, is that there were few truly evil characters. Other than in Jackie Brown, I can't think of any good guys in Tarantino movies. But there are very few purely evil characters. There's Mr. Blonde in Reservoir Dogs. In Pulp Fiction, there's Zed and his buddy. But just about every other character, despite being a criminal or corrupt or a junkie or whatever is sufficiently fleshed out and humanized so that they all become real people and all become at least mildly sympathetic.
In his last three movies, there is nothing but cruel, evil characters. He goes out of his way to create characters with only one side: cruel and evil. This movie is called Hateful Eight, even.
Tarantino famously loves exploitation and B cinema. What was so great about his early movies is that he took that aesthetic and those tricks and fleshed them out to create full, rich worlds and movies. Recently, he's just copying and cleaning up. It's essentially become a parody.
All that said, I did watch a three hour movie that did not feel like three hours, and that means something. This wasn't a bad movie. It was a cruel movie (which is sometimes OK depending on one's mood). It was perhaps an unnecessary movie, whatever that means. It doesn't add anything to my spirit and it doesn't add anything to the culture, which is probably what I mean by that. But it was fine.
I think I'm just mostly sad that this is the best he's got.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 7:38 am
by VinylGuy
The Argonaut wrote:This movie made me think about that, too. When did we stop needing Tarantino? I'd say after Death Proof.
One of the great things about his early movies, I'm thinking especially of Pulp Fiction, is that there were few truly evil characters. Other than in Jackie Brown, I can't think of any good guys in Tarantino movies. But there are very few purely evil characters. There's Mr. Blonde in Reservoir Dogs. In Pulp Fiction, there's Zed and his buddy. But just about every other character, despite being a criminal or corrupt or a junkie or whatever is sufficiently fleshed out and humanized so that they all become real people and all become at least mildly sympathetic.
In his last three movies, there is nothing but cruel, evil characters. He goes out of his way to create characters with only one side: cruel and evil. This movie is called Hateful Eight, even.
Tarantino famously loves exploitation and B cinema. What was so great about his early movies is that he took that aesthetic and those tricks and fleshed them out to create full, rich worlds and movies. Recently, he's just copying and cleaning up. It's essentially become a parody.
All that said, I did watch a three hour movie that did not feel like three hours, and that means something. This wasn't a bad movie. It was a cruel movie (which is sometimes OK depending on one's mood). It was perhaps an unnecessary movie, whatever that means. It doesn't add anything to my spirit and it doesn't add anything to the culture, which is probably what I mean by that. But it was fine.
I think I'm just mostly sad that this is the best he's got.
Great post. It reminds me of something i read about a conversation between oliver stone and quentin. Seems Stone said to him " your movies are just fine, but i make films. About real things¨".
I get it now.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 7:40 am
by BurtReynolds
I always figured Tarantino was some kind of autistic.
Re: Tarantino
Posted: Sat January 09, 2016 11:32 am
by stip
I just saw this - not his best but still enjoyable. I've read some interesting arguments about how this is about contemporary US race relations that I find pretty interesting and adds a lot of extra dimensions to the movie
It did make me excited to see Channing Tatum play gambit