Red Mosquito

pnjguy wrote:at the very least, all of these formats are going to sound better then what we've all heard correct?

Probably.

CopperTom wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

Vinyl is the least attractive bootleg format. Too bad the fanbase fetishizes vinyl. $$$.

I mean bootleg recordings never sound that great on vinyl, but that's because the people that make boots often don't have the masters to work from. So they're never going to sound amazing.

bodysnatcher wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

Vinyl is the least attractive bootleg format. Too bad the fanbase fetishizes vinyl.

wonder why?

Flipping a record or changing discs after just a few songs seems horrible. It must take you out of the flow.

i think it's funny they are using the "sponsored by no one" image on the back of the Vault packaging for this show. sure, it's a snapshot of history, but still funny given how this band is now "sponsored by everyone".

CopperTom wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

Vinyl is the least attractive bootleg format. Too bad the fanbase fetishizes vinyl.

wonder why?

Flipping a record or changing discs after just a few songs seems horrible. It must take you out of the flow.

oh for sure, I never understood live shows on vinyl. same with comedy albums.

whygodeepaz wrote:

CopperTom wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

Vinyl is the least attractive bootleg format. Too bad the fanbase fetishizes vinyl. $$$.

I mean bootleg recordings never sound that great on vinyl, but that's because the people that make boots often don't have the masters to work from. So they're never going to sound amazing.

I don't mean the quality of vinyl. I mean the inconvenience.

I really thought we'd get Red Rocks, but I'll take this one.

the only reason i bought this is because i still have $500 in a gift certificate to burn through.

Simple Torture wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

They smell so good when you open them.

Oh man, you open yours?!?!?!?!

Teeeeeekay wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:I can't believe people buy these kinds of releases on vinyl, that still seems bizarre to me.

I wish they'd make them digital only, perhaps then we'd get more than one per year.

They smell so good when you open them.

Oh man, you open yours?!?!?!?!

How else am I going to smell/taste it?

On a side note, I'm not going to beat around the bush here but does anyone have the vault shows in flac? It's bogus there is no download included with all of these.

bodysnatcher wrote:i think it's funny they are using the "sponsored by no one" image on the back of the Vault packaging for this show. sure, it's a snapshot of history, but still funny given how this band is now "sponsored by everyone".

Pretty much all bands are at this point.

VinylGuy wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:i think it's funny they are using the "sponsored by no one" image on the back of the Vault packaging for this show. sure, it's a snapshot of history, but still funny given how this band is now "sponsored by everyone".

Pretty much all bands are at this point.

Remember the (fake) story about the band turning down the Viagra sponsorship that featured a penis dancing to Alive.

Shipping to get this out here is almost as much as the vinyl, and yet I'm still tempted

E.H. Ruddock wrote:So releasing something that is already out there, is it laziness or does the band but want us to have something "new" for some reason?

What is "out there" sounds like complete shit. It's a crappy mono soundboard feed matrixed with a phasey, medicore audience recording.

pnjguy wrote:at the very least, all of these formats are going to sound better then what we've all heard correct?

They would have to try really hard to provide something worse than what we already have.

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

pnjguy wrote:at the very least, all of these formats are going to sound better then what we've all heard correct?

They would have to try really hard to provide something worse than what we already have.

Don't challenge them, wct

bodysnatcher wrote:

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:

pnjguy wrote:at the very least, all of these formats are going to sound better then what we've all heard correct?

They would have to try really hard to provide something worse than what we already have.

Don't challenge them, wct

They're already removing a bunch of songs.

immorality