Red Mosquito

It doesn't seem to me to be a conspiracy if it's all contained to the same entity. Fox is trying to protect Fox.

Epstein’s Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Including CIA Chief, Goldman’s Top Lawyer:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/jeffrey-ep ... y-c9f6a3ff



How long are we going to pretend this was just some random rich pervert?

Who... who's pretending that?

epilogue wrote:Who... who's pretending that?

The majority of the US population and media?

I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

elliseamos wrote:I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

That’s the same article friend

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

That’s the same article friend

I didn't say otherwise. I posted that tweet to share the Noam excuses.

I do wish that rag-tag group at the WSJ luck breaking into the mainstream. Some day...

elliseamos wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

That’s the same article friend

I didn't say otherwise. I posted that tweet to share the Noam excuses.

I do wish that rag-tag group at the WSJ luck breaking into the mainstream. Some day...

Wait…. What do you think I meant in the post at 4:34?

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

That’s the same article friend

I didn't say otherwise. I posted that tweet to share the Noam excuses.

I do wish that rag-tag group at the WSJ luck breaking into the mainstream. Some day...

Wait…. What do you think I meant?

Conspiracy Theory:
"The majority of the US population and media pretend this was just some random rich pervert."

When a mainstream media outlet breaks a story as soon as more evidence is found about the rich pervs connection to even more important & influencial people. Which has been the main driver of the perv (and his girlfriend's) story all along.

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:Who... who's pretending that?

The majority of the US population and media?

elliseamos wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

elliseamos wrote:I'm pretty sure no one is pretending that, which is why the guys name inspires immediate headlines:

That’s the same article friend

I didn't say otherwise. I posted that tweet to share the Noam excuses.

I do wish that rag-tag group at the WSJ luck breaking into the mainstream. Some day...

Wait…. What do you think I meant?

Conspiracy Theory:
"The majority of the US population and media pretend this was just some random rich pervert."

When a mainstream media outlet breaks a story as soon as more evidence is found about the rich pervs connection to even more important & influencial people. Which has been the main driver of the perv (and his girlfriend's) story all along.

The 4:34 post friend, that’s out of context

My timestamp is different than yours.

Explain your point.

Conspiracy: He was an intel agent, not just a rich perv.

Oh.

elliseamos wrote:Oh.

Yikes

Though this one might be in us, Ellis. This is the bat shit conspiracy thread.

I'm still trying to figure out what difference this would make.

I personally think it would be important to know if the US government was aiding and abetting Epstein in the sex trafficking of young women, but you do you.

bigfoot

Bi_3 wrote:I personally think it would be important to know if the US government was aiding and abetting Epstein in the sex trafficking of young women, but you do you.

So you've gone full Q now.

Got it.

elliseamos wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I personally think it would be important to know if the US government was aiding and abetting Epstein in the sex trafficking of young women, but you do you.

So you've gone full Q now.

Got it.

Now?