Re: The Environment Thread
Posted: Sat February 27, 2021 9:53 pm
Good thing the Paris treaty is back on!



Russia is part of Europe?!Bi_3 wrote:Good thing the Paris treaty is back on!
That was certainly the key takeaway hereelliseamos wrote:Russia is part of Europe?!Bi_3 wrote:Good thing the Paris treaty is back on!
I'd consider that progress, but it would also further the point to have Europe even less prominently on the chart, no?Bi_3 wrote:That was certainly the key takeaway hereelliseamos wrote:Russia is part of Europe?!Bi_3 wrote:Good thing the Paris treaty is back on!
when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
That might be a while but so far:96583UP wrote:when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
elliseamos wrote:That might be a while but so far:96583UP wrote:when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
1) Chemicals bad
2) Trump EPA deliberately useless
3) Texas loves pollution
4) Probably Russia
5) Glenn Greenwald would have written an even longer story to make the same points (except the Russia part)
good morning, sunshine.Bi_3 wrote:elliseamos wrote:That might be a while but so far:96583UP wrote:when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
1) Chemicals bad
2) Trump EPA deliberately useless
3) Texas loves pollution
4) Probably Russia
5) Glenn Greenwald would have written an even longer story to make the same points (except the Russia part)
I've finished it now.elliseamos wrote:That might be a while but so far:96583UP wrote:when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
1) Chemicals bad
2) Trump EPA deliberately useless
3) Texas loves pollution
4) Probably Russia
5) Glenn Greenwald would have written an even longer story to make the same points (except the Russia part)
records show that his epa staff suggested these companies take another look at their numbers to see if they measured wrong and then years of data were changed to lower the output of this toxin by extreme amounts.simple schoolboy wrote:How did Trump exert influence over the EPA? He could barely get the FDA to pump the breaks on their stupidity.
thank youelliseamos wrote:I've finished it now.elliseamos wrote:That might be a while but so far:96583UP wrote:when you are done reading pls come back and summarize in no more than 5 bullet pointselliseamos wrote:https://theintercept.com/2021/03/18/epa-pollution-cancer-ethylene-oxide/
Still not done reading this, but I thought it was worth sharing.
1) Chemicals bad
2) Trump EPA deliberately useless
3) Texas loves pollution
4) Probably Russia
5) Glenn Greenwald would have written an even longer story to make the same points (except the Russia part)
Cross out #4 & #5 and replace them with "the problem is worse than we thought" and "Biden's EPA can try to change things, but the companies have a head start on hiding/changing data" respectively.
EPA at this point is basically lindsay lohan's asshole after a frat partyelliseamos wrote:records show that his epa staff suggested these companies take another look at their numbers to see if they measured wrong and then years of data were changed to lower the output of this toxin by extreme amounts.simple schoolboy wrote:How did Trump exert influence over the EPA? He could barely get the FDA to pump the breaks on their stupidity.
