Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Fri August 09, 2013 1:32 pm
Wow.
They sure suck at David Tennant and Bill Murray, though.
They sure suck at David Tennant and Bill Murray, though.
no doubt.digster wrote:I think if two of the three songs we heard hadn't fallen relatively flat here, there might be more excitement about it. People who may not be fans of the new material are probably feeling like they'd wait and see, rather than go all in on the new record.
I prefer studio, typically.dimejinky99 wrote:Are PJ songs not usually better live? Or is it vice versa?
It's been a while since I've listened
Same for me, but live versions used to be a lot closerdurdencommatyler wrote:I prefer studio, typically.dimejinky99 wrote:Are PJ songs not usually better live? Or is it vice versa?
It's been a while since I've listened
Those are the best I've come across, but I've also tried not to listen too much so i haven't hunted for anything betterThejambi wrote:Is there a better capture of LB & FD apart from videogremmie on youtube?
I think it will be more enjoyable .Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.durdencommatyler wrote:It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
Exactly. Or maybe there's a brass section or something. Or if the lyrics are slightly different. I don't know. I'm just saying I think it's possible for the studio version to improve opinions about the song.Coach wrote:I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.durdencommatyler wrote:It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
This almost makes me want to agree with you.Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
I'd need to hear the whole album before I could make a call like that. So much of it will be context, I think.Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
Oh man, I didn't even mean to do that.Thejambi wrote:This almost makes me want to agree with you.Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.
If they had the clapping to Future Days, then I take back what I wrote!durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly. Or maybe there's a brass section or something. Or if the lyrics are slightly different. I don't know. I'm just saying I think it's possible for the studio version to improve opinions about the song.Coach wrote:I think a proper studio recording could bump this up by .5 a star, especially if they add a real piano to it, and maybe let Mike or Stone chime in with some nifty guitar sounds.durdencommatyler wrote:It depends on how different the arrangement is. Maybe not at all. But maybe it's more than just Ed and a guitar or whatever on the album. I'm not saying it'll magically become better, but there could be a lot more to like about a studio version, depending on what they've done with it.Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:It's funny how people seem to think that "Future Days" will magically become a better song once a better recording is available.
But maybe it'll be the exact same thing, just compressed.
I agree with you. I like Future Days. My fear is that like most recent Ed solo songs, I will grow tired of it. Still, I have been humming it over the last few weeks.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I know im in the minority, but i think future days is good, not overly exciting, but its a good song, and im sure they could add some touches to the studio version to bump it up a bit like coach said, but if you totally hate the live version then you most likely won't like the studio version either
That makes it even betterCoach wrote:Oh man, I didn't even mean to do that.Thejambi wrote:This almost makes me want to agree with you.Coach wrote:This might be unpopular here, but if I was BoB for a day and was allowed to eliminate either Lightning Bolt or Future Days from the new record, I'd strike LB.