Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Sun August 11, 2013 5:45 pm
Actually looking at it, I'm 99% sure this tracklist is a fake. Brendan O'Brien has confirmed in Rolling Stone that Punch 'n' Judy WILL be on the album
Yeah, why would a band notoriously obsessed with control, running into the middle stages of a declining productivity but barely halfway through with their lives, jealously guard future remaster bonus tracks?Lounge Lizard wrote:If this is real... Why delete CC and LIR from youtube? Whats the secrecy? I dont get
Why indeed....UNLESS THIS IS A FAKE TRACKLIST!!!!!McParadigm wrote:Yeah, why would a band notoriously obsessed with control, running into the middle stages of a declining productivity but barely halfway through with their lives, jealously guard future remaster bonus tracks?Lounge Lizard wrote:If this is real... Why delete CC and LIR from youtube? Whats the secrecy? I dont get
I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
I think you can assume that this is true, yes.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
I usually get a kick out of them, they are obvious fakes but fun to read and think aboutharmless wrote:I think you can assume that this is true, yes.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
You know the thing I hate most about them? I hate that we'll look back, and most of them will have been better than the actual tracklist.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I usually get a kick out of them, they are obvious fakes but fun to read and think aboutharmless wrote:I think you can assume that this is true, yes.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
why now you dont bitching??????harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
That may be possible, but they are just names, they really don't effect the songsharmless wrote:You know the thing I hate most about them? I hate that we'll look back, and most of them will have been better than the actual tracklist.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I usually get a kick out of them, they are obvious fakes but fun to read and think aboutharmless wrote:I think you can assume that this is true, yes.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?
This is true enough.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:That may be possible, but they are just names, they really don't effect the songsharmless wrote:You know the thing I hate most about them? I hate that we'll look back, and most of them will have been better than the actual tracklist.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I usually get a kick out of them, they are obvious fakes but fun to read and think aboutharmless wrote:I think you can assume that this is true, yes.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:You don't enjoy seeing the fakes?harmless wrote:I can find nothing good about this RM account or your use of it.lecherouslittlestump wrote:I'm a member of the Jamily, is my word not good enough for you?harmless wrote:What reason do we have to believe that this tracklist is any more real than the other fakes?