Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Sun August 18, 2024 4:12 pm
I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
All art is necessary.BurtReynolds wrote:movies are unnecessary
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
There was something off about the way the movie depicted violence and abuse. It wasn’t shown as slapstick like the first one but it also wasn’t shown as something awful to be avoided. It was like it was routine. Very unusual even for 80s moviesepilogue wrote:Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
What 80s movies don't show abuse as routine?Bi_3 wrote:There was something off about the way the movie depicted violence and abuse. It wasn’t shown as slapstick like the first one but it also wasn’t shown as something awful to be avoided. It was like it was routine. Very unusual even for 80s moviesepilogue wrote:Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
Gremlinsepilogue wrote:What 80s movies don't show abuse as routine?Bi_3 wrote:There was something off about the way the movie depicted violence and abuse. It wasn’t shown as slapstick like the first one but it also wasn’t shown as something awful to be avoided. It was like it was routine. Very unusual even for 80s moviesepilogue wrote:Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
epilogue wrote:What 80s movies don't show abuse as routine?Bi_3 wrote:There was something off about the way the movie depicted violence and abuse. It wasn’t shown as slapstick like the first one but it also wasn’t shown as something awful to be avoided. It was like it was routine. Very unusual even for 80s moviesepilogue wrote:Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
I'm not trying to trap you. I'm not being snarky. I genuinely don't know what you mean and would love some examples so that I can understand your point. Maybe I agree. Maybe I don't. But as per usual with your posts, I have no idea.Bi_3 wrote:epilogue wrote:What 80s movies don't show abuse as routine?Bi_3 wrote:There was something off about the way the movie depicted violence and abuse. It wasn’t shown as slapstick like the first one but it also wasn’t shown as something awful to be avoided. It was like it was routine. Very unusual even for 80s moviesepilogue wrote:Oh for sure. The OG is just about perfect. 2 and 3 are superfluous, I guess, but they are each enjoyable in their own way. I haven't actually watched 3 in a really long time. But my memory is that it's a ton of fun and a nice twist on the old formula that offered a lot more than 2, which was really just the first one but more annoying and tedious.wease wrote:I like all of them. Dime is right, tho. 2 and 3 are unnecessary.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.