Re: The most embarrassing thing from PJ’s career (poll is up
Posted: Mon May 20, 2024 1:20 pm
why is the Target deal not on here?
I hate to tell you this, but actors don't smoke real cigarettes on screen either.dprival78 wrote:gatorade in the wine bottles probably deserves a few votes
also I went back to The Fixer video a while ago and it no longer had the Target tag on it... so, it was still funny (acting, canned audience and all), but much easier to stomach than as a Target adbodysnatcher wrote:I think the Oracle gig was the whole band.
While the Target thing was embarrassing at face value (specifically the commercial and Fixer video), I think it gets a pass bc I think the band felt it beneficial for independent record stores, whether that was true or not. So, kind of watching out for the little guys and themselves simultaneously?
the funniestbodysnatcher wrote:lol the audience was so hilarious in that
That's not entirely true, it's also (even primarily) a clip promoting Target.sweeper wrote:The Target ad is fine. It's just a clip promoting their album. Who cares.
I think you have to be brainwashed by the early '90s ethos of bands selling out by doing anything promotional to be truly bothered by it. Thankfully, the newer generations don't care about that stupid stuff at all.
What do you mean it's primarily a clip promoting Target? The entire thing was within the context of promoting where their new album could be exclusively purchased. As far as I recall too, the only Target reference was in the 30 second commercial. There wasn't a Target component to the full-length video. I think people here are misremembering that piece. This was effectively a commercial that promoted their album and where to get it. Big whoop.Birds in Hell wrote:That's not entirely true, it's also (even primarily) a clip promoting Target.sweeper wrote:The Target ad is fine. It's just a clip promoting their album. Who cares.
I think you have to be brainwashed by the early '90s ethos of bands selling out by doing anything promotional to be truly bothered by it. Thankfully, the newer generations don't care about that stupid stuff at all.
It's still pretty weird, I can't imagine any other credible band doing something like that.
Bad vibes all around.
lmao imagine thinking it’s a good thing to live in a capitalist dystopia so devoid of shame that even artists who are already filthy rich have no qualms about participating in anti-art to shovel more money into the pockets of even richer scumbagssweeper wrote:What do you mean it's primarily a clip promoting Target? The entire thing was within the context of promoting where their new album could be exclusively purchased. As far as I recall too, the only Target reference was in the 30 second commercial. There wasn't a Target component to the full-length video. I think people here are misremembering that piece. This was effectively a commercial that promoted their album and where to get it. Big whoop.Birds in Hell wrote:That's not entirely true, it's also (even primarily) a clip promoting Target.sweeper wrote:The Target ad is fine. It's just a clip promoting their album. Who cares.
I think you have to be brainwashed by the early '90s ethos of bands selling out by doing anything promotional to be truly bothered by it. Thankfully, the newer generations don't care about that stupid stuff at all.
It's still pretty weird, I can't imagine any other credible band doing something like that.
Bad vibes all around.
The "credible band" thing is a relic of the early 90s alternative ethos. It's completely out the window now because almost no one cares about it anymore outside of 40+ year old people that lived back in that era and were told it mattered. The whole concept of "selling out" is over.
A bit of sneaky goalpost shifting here. The conversation was about "the Target ad," referring to the 30 second ad where the band is playing in front of giant Target logos on green screen and fans getting Target logos stamped on their hands (which, yes, is extremely embarrassing) -- not the full music video.sweeper wrote:What do you mean it's primarily a clip promoting Target? The entire thing was within the context of promoting where their new album could be exclusively purchased. As far as I recall too, the only Target reference was in the 30 second commercial. There wasn't a Target component to the full-length video. I think people here are misremembering that piece. This was effectively a commercial that promoted their album and where to get it. Big whoop.Birds in Hell wrote:That's not entirely true, it's also (even primarily) a clip promoting Target.sweeper wrote:The Target ad is fine. It's just a clip promoting their album. Who cares.
I think you have to be brainwashed by the early '90s ethos of bands selling out by doing anything promotional to be truly bothered by it. Thankfully, the newer generations don't care about that stupid stuff at all.
It's still pretty weird, I can't imagine any other credible band doing something like that.
Bad vibes all around.
The "credible band" thing is a relic of the early 90s alternative ethos. It's completely out the window now because almost no one cares about it anymore outside of 40+ year old people that lived back in that era and were told it mattered. The whole concept of "selling out" is over.