Re: Election 2016
Posted: Mon August 01, 2016 4:03 pm
Alanis Morrisette postSelf wrote:lolTrump wrote:...has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution...
Alanis Morrisette postSelf wrote:lolTrump wrote:...has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution...
You oughtta know...Strat wrote:Alanis Morrisette postSelf wrote:lolTrump wrote:...has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution...
Iholdthepain wrote:Sorry, that was bad... even for my standards.
anyone planning on building a wall - a tremendous wall - around your town?Monkey_Driven wrote:Our local primary is tomorrow. I'm having a really hard time finding enough information on local candidates.
Self wrote:lolTrump wrote:...has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution...

Green Habit wrote:Nate Silver also said that Hillary was a 77%-23% favorite just two weeks ago. Let's let the DNC finish and soak in and then see what happens.
I saw that this morning. lol. What is he talking about?Self wrote:How did we get here? How is the best Repubs could do?
Yepverb_to_trust wrote:That was my reaction as wellBurtReynolds wrote:If half of those are true, I like her more.verb_to_trust wrote:https://patriotpost.us/pages/87
A Facebook friend of mine just posted these damning Clinton quotes in response to someone criticizing Trumps fairly insane (by comparison) comments.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/hildabeast.aspLoathedVermin72 wrote:Yepverb_to_trust wrote:That was my reaction as wellBurtReynolds wrote:If half of those are true, I like her more.verb_to_trust wrote:https://patriotpost.us/pages/87
A Facebook friend of mine just posted these damning Clinton quotes in response to someone criticizing Trumps fairly insane (by comparison) comments.
Nate Silver doesn't publish a poll. He publishes a probability of the candidate being elected based on polls that are weighted according to size, past performance, and a bunch of I don't know what. In that tweet, it's not that 68% of people will vote for Hillary, it's that she has a 68% chance of winning the election, if it were held today.tragabigzanda wrote:Didn't we already learn these sorts of polls are arbitrary back when Gore won the popular vote but lost the election? I think it's just gonna come down to Ohio and Penn this year, with every other vote being an exercise in ego-futility...Green Habit wrote:Green Habit wrote:Nate Silver also said that Hillary was a 77%-23% favorite just two weeks ago. Let's let the DNC finish and soak in and then see what happens.