Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Posted: Thu November 11, 2021 4:47 pm
FUCK ICE
Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Play the hand you’re dealt! Lol.dimejinky99 wrote:Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Not when the only vet in the room happens to be the witness for the defence next up on the stand
Bammer wrote:Play the hand you’re dealt! Lol.dimejinky99 wrote:Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Not when the only vet in the room happens to be the witness for the defence next up on the stand
By the way stop pretending that anyone in a position like this wouldn’t take advantage of it. I have started watching politics a lot more closely over the past couple of years and what I see sickens me. But they all do it. Trump, Biden, doesn’t matter they’re all the fucking same.
Well color me surprised that we have hack judges to go along with our hack lawyers and hack politiciansdimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Play the hand you’re dealt! Lol.dimejinky99 wrote:Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Not when the only vet in the room happens to be the witness for the defence next up on the stand
By the way stop pretending that anyone in a position like this wouldn’t take advantage of it. I have started watching politics a lot more closely over the past couple of years and what I see sickens me. But they all do it. Trump, Biden, doesn’t matter they’re all the fucking same.
A judge is obliged to leave his political leanings and personal beliefs at home and not take them into the courtroom. In any normal country anyways.
I am not sure taking a moment to honour veterans on a day to honour veterans is taking political leanings or personal beliefs to their court.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Play the hand you’re dealt! Lol.dimejinky99 wrote:Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Not when the only vet in the room happens to be the witness for the defence next up on the stand
By the way stop pretending that anyone in a position like this wouldn’t take advantage of it. I have started watching politics a lot more closely over the past couple of years and what I see sickens me. But they all do it. Trump, Biden, doesn’t matter they’re all the fucking same.
A judge is obliged to leave his political leanings and personal beliefs at home and not take them into the courtroom. In any normal country anyways.
The prosecutor mentioning in open court the defendant's choice to assert his 5A right to remain silent after arrest is far from minor shit.Peeps wrote:his ringtone (first off who still has their phones on in a courtroom?)
the whole yelling over minor shit seems a bit troubling
i dont care if he agrees with my world view or not but he should not being doing so many things that are outside the normals of justice
Bammer wrote: Well color me surprised that we have hack judges to go along with our hack lawyers and hack politicians
surfndestroy wrote:I am not sure taking a moment to honour veterans on a day to honour veterans is taking political leanings or personal beliefs to their court.dimejinky99 wrote:Bammer wrote:Play the hand you’re dealt! Lol.dimejinky99 wrote:Can you believe this Nazi judge has an American flag in his courtroom?Bi_3 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Completely normal trial judge
This is normal behavior in many government scenarios. We had a moment of silence for vets this morning and the federal government is on holiday today.
Not when the only vet in the room happens to be the witness for the defence next up on the stand
By the way stop pretending that anyone in a position like this wouldn’t take advantage of it. I have started watching politics a lot more closely over the past couple of years and what I see sickens me. But they all do it. Trump, Biden, doesn’t matter they’re all the fucking same.
A judge is obliged to leave his political leanings and personal beliefs at home and not take them into the courtroom. In any normal country anyways.
Some follow-up on this, the ipad device that the ADA was attempting to use to "zoom" into the video does actually do interpolation. Which is this:Bammer wrote:Agreed. They should be like referees in a football game. You shouldn’t be able to detect bias, and if you feel like you can, then yeah, that’s a problem.McParadigm wrote:Generally speaking, if you feel like you can read the judge’s worldview enough from his conduct during this trial to suspect that opposing worldviews is Peeps’s issue, that’s subpar.Bammer wrote:Like … senile? Or like … doesn’t share your exact worldview?
Worldview aside, he said that magnifying an image is “adding data” to it and therefore unreliable, so that’s pretty weird for a person regularly presiding over criminal trials.
Personally, my experience with judges is that a large percentage of them are absolute geezer morons with a clear preferential lean in many trials, so his stupidity seems like a rather ordinary display of a broader, possibly national problem….not something unique to Rittenhouse.
That said, detecting bias can kinda depend what side you’re on. Can’t it?
So it seems like the judge is inadvertently correct.One cannot "add" information to a picture that doesn't already include it. In order to make a "larger" picture, digital zoom uses interpolation to estimate what it "thinks" the pixels should be; it doesn't simply make pixels "bigger."

Ello Sailor wrote:Old mate's ugly cry is going to be meme'd to death.
That’s a MacRumors message board post, and the follow-ups are not generally favorable to it.Bi_3 wrote:Some follow-up on this, the ipad device that the ADA was attempting to use to "zoom" into the video does actually do interpolation. Which is this:
So it seems like the judge is inadvertently correct.One cannot "add" information to a picture that doesn't already include it. In order to make a "larger" picture, digital zoom uses interpolation to estimate what it "thinks" the pixels should be; it doesn't simply make pixels "bigger."
Team BL4zDMcParadigm wrote:That’s a MacRumors message board post, and the follow-ups are not generally favorable to it.Bi_3 wrote:Some follow-up on this, the ipad device that the ADA was attempting to use to "zoom" into the video does actually do interpolation. Which is this:
So it seems like the judge is inadvertently correct.One cannot "add" information to a picture that doesn't already include it. In order to make a "larger" picture, digital zoom uses interpolation to estimate what it "thinks" the pixels should be; it doesn't simply make pixels "bigger."
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/ky ... d.2322805/
McParadigm wrote:That’s a MacRumors message board post, and the follow-ups are not generally favorable to it.Bi_3 wrote:Some follow-up on this, the ipad device that the ADA was attempting to use to "zoom" into the video does actually do interpolation. Which is this:
So it seems like the judge is inadvertently correct.One cannot "add" information to a picture that doesn't already include it. In order to make a "larger" picture, digital zoom uses interpolation to estimate what it "thinks" the pixels should be; it doesn't simply make pixels "bigger."
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/ky ... d.2322805/