Page 214 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:48 pm
by Norah
Is
Spoiler: show
olerud
one?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:50 pm
by Norah
Boom.
Spoiler: show
Cuddyer
. For the active player.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:51 pm
by The Argonaut
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:AJ Burnett turned down a $12.75 million guarantee from the Phillies to sign for $8.5 million with the Pirates. For the most part, money is everything when it comes to signing free agents... but once in a while, someone surprises you. That's a pretty big sum to turn down to play somewhere you want.
I might be wrong, but didnt Burnett do the same thing either last year or the year before?
He said he would either retire or stay with the Pirates. Instead, he took more money to go to Philly. He has regrets.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:58 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:Boom.
Spoiler: show
Cuddyer
. For the active player.
You nailed them both. Good work, chud.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:58 pm
by Norah
The active player was easy. But then the hint on the inactive player made it not that hard either.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 6:59 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
I doubt pro athletes who have money and a ring have very few (if any) regrets. Just sayin.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 7:00 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:The active player was easy. But then the hint on the inactive player made it not that hard either.
Hint was pretty easy. I saw him play in the summer of 1993 when he was at his peak that year. Smoked everything that weekend. Was hitting
Spoiler: show
.401
at the end of the weekend.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 7:02 pm
by numbers
I got the inactive player but couldn't come up with the active one.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 7:40 pm
by Norah
Damnit hashtag, Bob Watson did it too.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 11:10 pm
by Norah

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 15, 2014 11:24 pm
by Lament
Image

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun November 16, 2014 1:46 pm
by numbers
This contract is so Marlins.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 3:11 pm
by philpritchard
I knew Olerud was the inactive player, obviously. It's one of my favourite pieces of baseball trivia because he only had 13 career triples in over 9000 plate appearances.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 4:28 pm
by 4/5
numbers wrote:This contract is so Marlins.
Pretty much.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 5:11 pm
by philpritchard
I don't even care how much money he ends up getting... the Jays signing Russell Martin is a very, very good sign.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 5:44 pm
by Electromatic
and the Cardinals just won another championship....

Braves trade gold glove right fielder along with Jordan Walden to St Louis, for Shelby Miller and a bag of baseballs.

Worst trade ever.

Fire John Hart.

Braves get vastly worse defensively, another average starting pitcher, and the Cardinals get a guy who isn't a great hitter, but is a terrific outfielder, his main issue is staying healthy.

This was about as stupid as it gets for Atlanta, meaning their outfield will probably still have TWO Terrible Uptons in it and Gattis if they don't have 400 errors it will be a freaking miracle.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 5:51 pm
by philpritchard
Electromatic wrote:and the Cardinals just won another championship....

Braves trade gold glove right fielder along with Jordan Walden to St Louis, for Shelby Miller and a bag of baseballs.

Worst trade ever.

Fire John Hart.

Braves get vastly worse defensively, another average starting pitcher, and the Cardinals get a guy who isn't a great hitter, but is a terrific outfielder, his main issue is staying healthy.

This was about as stupid as it gets for Atlanta, meaning their outfield will probably still have TWO Terrible Uptons in it and Gattis if they don't have 400 errors it will be a freaking miracle.
Yeah, it's one of those trades like the Fister trade last year where every team in the league is probably looking at it and saying "That's it? I could have beat that!"

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 5:57 pm
by numbers
Yeah, I dont see how St.L didnt have to throw in more than that.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 6:08 pm
by Biff Pocoroba
I come back to lunch to find that out? I knew the Braves would make off season deals, more to come no doubt, but seems like a big give away.

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon November 17, 2014 6:16 pm
by philpritchard
Biff Pocoroba wrote:I come back to lunch to find that out? I knew the Braves would make off season deals, more to come no doubt, but seems like a big give away.
Miller's a decent young pitcher, but there's no way that's the best they could do, is there? There had to be some team out there willing to up the offer.