Red Mosquito

surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Peeps wrote:

knee tunes wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Even if these numbers were accurate, that means that there have been 200,000 COVID-19 deaths in the past 30 days. That seems--and I'm just spitballing here--really bad.

The numbers that PHATJ posted are correct.

So, yes, the COVID deaths in April alone have been over 200,000

if the numbers are correct why not just use the numbers since COVID was a thing? cause it doesnt fit the narrative, right?

Correct.

PHATJ should compare the May 1st numbers with the seasonal flu death numbers, which would be the only comparable fight in his argument.

The other "deaths" don't require social distancing which is, from I what can gather, the point of his argument. Although aids is transmissible, it's not "contagious".

So if we were to use PHATJ's format for making a point, he is actually showing that he is losing.

And using his format come June 1st, he should by all accounts be embarrassed , but by then he will have long moved onto his next whatever.

P.S. abortions aren't tallyed anywhere as deaths as they were never added to the population to begin with

knee tunes wrote:So if we were to use PHATJ's format for making a point, he is actually showing that he is losing.

And using his format come June 1st, he should by all accounts be embarrassed , but by then he will have long moved onto his next whatever.

Everything I quoted is undoubtedly true, but I feel like only the bolded matters. Which is sad. Nothing anyone can do about it, except beat them in Nov and push em back a bit.

After a week plus of new cases in the single digits - we reached 0 new cases today. Pretty happy about that

[quote="knee tunes”]And using his format come June 1st, he should by all accounts be embarrassed , but by then he will have long moved onto his next whatever.[/quote]


What is a thing that’ll never happen, Alex?

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

HIV lasting so long, makes it difficult to get rid of. Always someone spreading it.

Anders wrote:HIV lasting so long, makes it difficult to get rid of. Always someone spreading it.

And the disease too

Anders wrote:HIV lasting so long, makes it difficult to get rid of. Always someone spreading it.

When will people learn not to put your dick in the diseased?

96583UP wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

Thats is not the actual number. The latest numbers are from 2018. I suspect the creator of that "fact sheet" took the absolute upper limit of the 2018 total estimate and divided it by 4. It took me 10 seconds of googling to find that.

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

Thats is not the actual number. The latest numbers are from 2018. I suspect the creator of that "fact sheet" took the absolute upper limit of the 2018 total estimate and divided it by 4. It took me 10 seconds of googling to find that.

What. Google "Worldometer aids"
2018 is not the latest Numbers

Google longer than 10 seconds maybe

Donald wrote:

Anders wrote:HIV lasting so long, makes it difficult to get rid of. Always someone spreading it.

When will people learn not to put your dick in the diseased?

Yeah people. Quit putting Ander's dick into the diseased.

Geez Louise

What?

knee tunes wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

Thats is not the actual number. The latest numbers are from 2018. I suspect the creator of that "fact sheet" took the absolute upper limit of the 2018 total estimate and divided it by 4. It took me 10 seconds of googling to find that.

What. Google "Worldometer aids"
2018 is not the latest Numbers

Google longer than 10 seconds maybe

It's a good thing that "Worldometer" lists its sources, because it's just some rando website, and I wouldn't trust their numbers unless they pulled from reputable organizations doing research on this topic. On this page they have links to the statistics they use to run their models, and they link to both the WHO and UNAIDS, and those organizations both use data sets that end in...2018.

https://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/
https://www.unaids.org/en/topic/data

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house ... clarations

Damn, the red team is bad at this.

Simple Torture wrote:

knee tunes wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

Thats is not the actual number. The latest numbers are from 2018. I suspect the creator of that "fact sheet" took the absolute upper limit of the 2018 total estimate and divided it by 4. It took me 10 seconds of googling to find that.

What. Google "Worldometer aids"
2018 is not the latest Numbers

Google longer than 10 seconds maybe

It's a good thing that "Worldometer" lists its sources, because it's just some rando website, and I wouldn't trust their numbers unless they pulled from reputable organizations doing research on this topic. On this page they have links to the statistics they use to run their models, and they link to both the WHO and UNAIDS, and those organizations both use data sets that end in...2018.

https://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/
https://www.unaids.org/en/topic/data

Simple Torture DESTROYS Knee Tunes!!!!!

theplatypus wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

knee tunes wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

96583UP wrote:surprised that the HIV/AIDs number is still so high

Not sure if serious.

i thought they had this better under control at this point

but you know i live in sheltered first world bubble

is there not an HIV vaccine yet?

sad

Thats is not the actual number. The latest numbers are from 2018. I suspect the creator of that "fact sheet" took the absolute upper limit of the 2018 total estimate and divided it by 4. It took me 10 seconds of googling to find that.

What. Google "Worldometer aids"
2018 is not the latest Numbers

Google longer than 10 seconds maybe

It's a good thing that "Worldometer" lists its sources, because it's just some rando website, and I wouldn't trust their numbers unless they pulled from reputable organizations doing research on this topic. On this page they have links to the statistics they use to run their models, and they link to both the WHO and UNAIDS, and those organizations both use data sets that end in...2018.

https://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/
https://www.unaids.org/en/topic/data

Simple Torture DESTROYS Knee Tunes!!!!!

Do I get an MSNBC show automatically now or is there a form I fill out?

Trump admin model updates ain’t good:

https://thehill.com/homenews/administra ... hs-by-june