Fantasy Football Discussion

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by washing machine »

But supposed one of them is taken?
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:But supposed one of them is taken?
Oh, then take the next best guy.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Okay, so here's my team for week 1 in my League of Record. Please let me know if you have any objections/revisions. But ONLY if you mean it. Please provide support.

QB: Jared Goff (right now I have a waiver claim on Lamar Jackson, if I get him, I'll start him instead)
RB: James Conner
RB: Kerryon Johnson
WR: Julio Jones
WR: Mike Evans
TE: Vance McDonald
FLX: David Montgomery
DEF: Ravens
KCR: Zuerlin

BENCH:
Cooper Kupp
Damien Williams
Tyler Boyd
Robbie Anderson

It's a full PPR, btw. I'm playing against the guy that I'm certain will win the league, so if you have any real advice... PLEASE.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

So a league I've been in for years has had some snags with the draft. We were supposed to have it tonight, but everyone was leaving town because of the hurricane. To add to that not many people can do an online draft tonight or tomorrow before the first game. So we decided to let the computer do an auto draft for all of us this year and we will work things out in trades and waivers. Might be dumb but might be kind of fun.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:So a league I've been in for years has had some snags with the draft. We were supposed to have it tonight, but everyone was leaving town because of the hurricane. To add to that not many people can do an online draft tonight or tomorrow before the first game. So we decided to let the computer do an auto draft for all of us this year and we will work things out in trades and waivers. Might be dumb but might be kind of fun.
Fascinating.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by washing machine »

I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by spike »

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
:shake:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.
If you're straight dropping, then it's Vance. Those other 2 could (should!) Have tremendous trade value. Don't just drop either of them.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by spike »

Guys, Rodgers owns the Bears.
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

I don't miss this at all.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by washing machine »

durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.
If you're straight dropping, then it's Vance. Those other 2 could (should!) Have tremendous trade value. Don't just drop either of them.
I'll probably drop Vance, yeah. Man, our auction was crazy. This league has descended into pure madness and I love it.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15816
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by washing machine »

The bidding on Rodgers was picking up steam around the $17-$18 dollar mark so someone randomly trolled a bid up to $59 at the drop of a hat while people were still feverishly clicking. He ended up going for $60 out of a $200 budget. HA!

Our league got rid of kickers this year in favor of an OP position, so everyone has at least three QBs. Not sure I like that.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?
Standard PPR.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?
Standard PPR.
With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything. :lol:
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?
Standard PPR.
With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything. :lol:
If I lose I will hold you personally responsible
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)
I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?
Standard PPR.
With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything. :lol:
If I lose I will hold you personally responsible
Well duh
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I swear every year there are like 3 running backs that are listed as Green Bay's starter, no one knows who it will be, and I end up with the wrong one on my fantasy team
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

I guess I wasn't paying attention and scoring settings changed, we're half point PPR now and losing a point per QB sack??
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post Reply