Red Mosquito

But supposed one of them is taken?

washing machine wrote:But supposed one of them is taken?

Oh, then take the next best guy.

Okay, so here's my team for week 1 in my League of Record. Please let me know if you have any objections/revisions. But ONLY if you mean it. Please provide support.

QB: Jared Goff (right now I have a waiver claim on Lamar Jackson, if I get him, I'll start him instead)
RB: James Conner
RB: Kerryon Johnson
WR: Julio Jones
WR: Mike Evans
TE: Vance McDonald
FLX: David Montgomery
DEF: Ravens
KCR: Zuerlin

BENCH:
Cooper Kupp
Damien Williams
Tyler Boyd
Robbie Anderson

It's a full PPR, btw. I'm playing against the guy that I'm certain will win the league, so if you have any real advice... PLEASE.

So a league I've been in for years has had some snags with the draft. We were supposed to have it tonight, but everyone was leaving town because of the hurricane. To add to that not many people can do an online draft tonight or tomorrow before the first game. So we decided to let the computer do an auto draft for all of us this year and we will work things out in trades and waivers. Might be dumb but might be kind of fun.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:So a league I've been in for years has had some snags with the draft. We were supposed to have it tonight, but everyone was leaving town because of the hurricane. To add to that not many people can do an online draft tonight or tomorrow before the first game. So we decided to let the computer do an auto draft for all of us this year and we will work things out in trades and waivers. Might be dumb but might be kind of fun.

Fascinating.

Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?

washing machine wrote:I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.

If you're straight dropping, then it's Vance. Those other 2 could (should!) Have tremendous trade value. Don't just drop either of them.

Guys, Rodgers owns the Bears.

I don't miss this at all.

durdencommatyler wrote:

washing machine wrote:I somehow ended up with three Steelers on my team. Need to drop either Smith-Schuster (unlikely), Conner, or Vance.

If you're straight dropping, then it's Vance. Those other 2 could (should!) Have tremendous trade value. Don't just drop either of them.

I'll probably drop Vance, yeah. Man, our auction was crazy. This league has descended into pure madness and I love it.

The bidding on Rodgers was picking up steam around the $17-$18 dollar mark so someone randomly trolled a bid up to $59 at the drop of a hat while people were still feverishly clicking. He ended up going for $60 out of a $200 budget. HA!

Our league got rid of kickers this year in favor of an OP position, so everyone has at least three QBs. Not sure I like that.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?

Standard PPR.

Mickey wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?

Standard PPR.

With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?

Standard PPR.

With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything.

If I lose I will hold you personally responsible

Mickey wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Just picked up Jackson on your move here, Joey. Thinking of starting him over Rogers (against Chicago?)

I think I might, yeah. What kind of scoring format is your league?

Standard PPR.

With the advantage that running QB's get in FF, I think, yeah, go with Jackson. Miami looks awful. The Bears have a strong D. I think it's entirely possible that the Pack win and the Ravens lose. But for fantasy purposes, I think Jackson's upside & matchup are hard to ignore.

FWIW, every ff "expert" that I've seen also likes Jackson more than Rodgers. But no one knows anything.

If I lose I will hold you personally responsible

Well duh

I swear every year there are like 3 running backs that are listed as Green Bay's starter, no one knows who it will be, and I end up with the wrong one on my fantasy team

I guess I wasn't paying attention and scoring settings changed, we're half point PPR now and losing a point per QB sack??