Red Mosquito

spike wrote:I was able to grab Sammy Watkins and Adrian Peterson, so don’t expect them to do anything this week.

i sat sammy watkins last week, and am starting him this week. and so i'll guarantee he won't do anything. in fact, i smell an acl tear.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:I was able to grab Sammy Watkins and Adrian Peterson, so don’t expect them to do anything this week.

i sat sammy watkins last week, and am starting him this week. and so i'll guarantee he won't do anything. in fact, i smell an acl tear.

Chris! I swear to god

Why do I keep starting Big Ben over Stafford

spike wrote:Why do I keep starting Big Ben over Stafford

You probably shouldn’t do that anymore

bodysnatcher wrote:

spike wrote:Why do I keep starting Big Ben over Stafford

You probably shouldn’t do that anymore

Man. Brees being out hurts me, but I also have Vance and JuJu, so Ben hurts me too.

washing machine wrote:Man. Brees being out hurts me, but I also have Vance and JuJu, so Ben hurts me too.

Vance might be okay. QB2 was hyper targeting him. Feels like he might be kid's safety blanket. Ben out hurts JuJu, for sure.

washing machine wrote:Man. Brees being out hurts me, but I also have Vance and JuJu, so Ben hurts me too.

it kills me. i have kamara in one league and michael thomas in another.

Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..

Current RBs are Fournette and Johnson (Sanders, Barber, and Murray on the bench). WRs are Adams, Beckham Jr., and Hilton, who's been parked in my flex

started phil lindsay cuz i knew the packers run D wouldn't let me down

Eked out a win with that sack on the final play of the Bears game. Allah truly is good.

Mickey wrote:Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..

Wait... someone is offering you Eckler for Adams?

You absolutely take that trade. Adams will probably improve over the season and maybe Melvin Gordon comes back but Eckler is the best fantasy back in the league. And WR's are easier to stream. 100% I'd take that trade.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..

Wait... someone is offering you Eckler for Adams?

You absolutely take that trade. Adams will probably improve over the season and maybe Melvin Gordon comes back but Eckler is the best fantasy back in the league. And WR's are easier to stream. 100% I'd take that trade.

I let it expire. I'd absolutely trade Adams but not for Eckler, too much unknown there

Ahem, Joseph

Mickey wrote:Ahem, Joseph

This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.

I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.

I just noticed my opponent this week is in violation of league rules. Technically, he could adjust his line-up so that he's no longer in violation by kick-off on Sunday. If he doesn't, then he loses points. I'm conflicted about this on several levels:

1. Am I under any obligation to tell him now?
2. Should I notify the commissioner now?
3. If I notify any other league-mates is that collusion?
4. A game was already played this week, does that mean he shouldn't be able to adjust anything?
5. The specific issue is that you can't roster, let alone play, 2 Chiefs players. He has Hardman and Butker in his lineup now. They shouldn't both even be ROSTERED. So even if he benches one of them, he's still in violation of the rules. But assuming he doesn't adjust his lineup, which player's points should the commissioner deduct?

Obviously, the difference in potential points between Hardman and Butker is substantial. You guys have any thoughts on how to deal with this?

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Ahem, Joseph

This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.

I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.

Oh definitely. The same guy tried to offer me John Ross for Aaron Rodgers btw.

durdencommatyler wrote:I just noticed my opponent this week is in violation of league rules. Technically, he could adjust his line-up so that he's no longer in violation by kick-off on Sunday. If he doesn't, then he loses points. I'm conflicted about this on several levels:

1. Am I under any obligation to tell him now?
2. Should I notify the commissioner now?
3. If I notify any other league-mates is that collusion?
4. A game was already played this week, does that mean he shouldn't be able to adjust anything?
5. The specific issue is that you can't roster, let alone play, 2 Chiefs players. He has Hardman and Butker in his lineup now. They shouldn't both even be ROSTERED. So even if he benches one of them, he's still in violation of the rules. But assuming he doesn't adjust his lineup, which player's points should the commissioner deduct?

Obviously, the difference in potential points between Hardman and Butker is substantial. You guys have any thoughts on how to deal with this?

Yeah, get rid of that dumb rule.

Mickey wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Mickey wrote:Ahem, Joseph

This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.

I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.

Oh definitely. The same guy tried to offer me John Ross for Aaron Rodgers btw.

*fart noise*