Red Mosquito

E.H. Ruddock wrote:*Edit - it's fucked up no matter which side is doing it.

And they both do it. A lot.

‘Merica!

spike wrote:is schoolboy maserati mike?

Almost missed this. Sorry you got bottom of page'd.

All flash, no substance?

Bi_3 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Buck Sexton lol

Watching right-wingers swing from a sense of glorious vindication to crushing disappointment and back, like this was some college football game, has made for a interesting week.

Pleading for mistrial with prejudice to mistrial without was something.

I wonder how the continental justice system would compare in this case. Heck, maybe our commonwealth siblings do things differently.

Wow. You knew the progressive media was sick in the head, but this is seriously bad.

Bi_3 wrote:Wow. You knew the progressive media was sick in the head, but this is seriously bad.

Its standard practice, but most of the time jurors don't have credible fear of violence. I wonder if they treated jurors of say mafia trials any differently from Casey Anthony type trials (lots of public interest, no threats to the jurors).

Not Guilty.

what were the five felony charges he was acquitted of?

edit: found them

first-degree intentional homicide
first-degree reckless homicide
attempted first-degree intentional homicide
two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety.


You could make the case that at least the bottom two counts should've stuck.

Kyle Acquittenhouse

BurtReynolds wrote:

It's the right verdict, but it's not a victory.

Bi_3 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

It's the right verdict, but it's not a victory.

A victory would be no charges ever being filed. He fulfilled a duty to retreat that didn't even exist in that jurisdiction.

So will it still be a victory when some ‘antifa’ guy turns up armed at a protest and ‘defends’ himself by murdering a few people that you happen to agree with?

Weird precedent to set, never mind to celebrate. (The usual suspect Factions online are celebrating like they’ve personally won the superbowl or something).

dimejinky99 wrote:So will it still be a victory when some ‘antifa’ guy turns up armed at a protest and ‘defends’ himself by murdering a few people that you happen to agree with?

Weird precedent to set, never mind to celebrate. (The usual suspect Factions online are celebrating like they’ve personally won the superbowl or something).

If those people are dumb enough to attack an armed individual not instigating anything then sure. Even communists have the right to self defense.

How does it feel knowing you’re having the best wank of your entire life at the same time joe rogan and Alex white are?

There’s gotta be a word for that.

Sadly, even commies have a right to defend themselves

simple schoolboy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:So will it still be a victory when some ‘antifa’ guy turns up armed at a protest and ‘defends’ himself by murdering a few people that you happen to agree with?

Weird precedent to set, never mind to celebrate. (The usual suspect Factions online are celebrating like they’ve personally won the superbowl or something).

If those people are dumb enough to attack an armed individual not instigating anything then sure. Even communists have the right to self defense.

Is travelling across state lines with an assault rifle self Defence? Or is it instigating?
Enquiring minds wanna know.

dimejinky99 wrote:How does it feel knowing you’re having the best wank of your entire life at the same time joe rogan and Alex white are?

There’s gotta be a word for that.

Wank? Relief that the jury didn't nullify in the direction of, "fuck this kid, none of the factual elements support the charges, but he should go to jail regardless".

dimejinky99 wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:So will it still be a victory when some ‘antifa’ guy turns up armed at a protest and ‘defends’ himself by murdering a few people that you happen to agree with?

Weird precedent to set, never mind to celebrate. (The usual suspect Factions online are celebrating like they’ve personally won the superbowl or something).

If those people are dumb enough to attack an armed individual not instigating anything then sure. Even communists have the right to self defense.

Is travelling across state lines with an assault rifle self Defence? Or is it instigating?
Enquiring minds wanna know.

your enquiries have been satisfied.