Page 23 of 46
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:24 am
by LoathedVermin72
Mecca wrote:Like, it is very obvious to me that the root of the humor is that Homer is saying "yes, once" to the instance that he just witnessed. It's a worse joke the other way around.
Umm, wrong.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:31 am
by Norah
No, Mecca is right.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:34 am
by LoathedVermin72
Oh my god, no. Guys. Come on.
If Homer were referencing the incident he just witnessed, that would mean he is making a quip. Homer is an oblivious buffoon and nowhere near clever or aware enough to make a joke like that.
This is an absurdist joke. The joke is that it's a silly, extremely specific question that would obviously warrant a negative response, but Homer does the unexpected and, ridiculously, answers positively.
Jesus, guys.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:36 am
by Norah
It's not a quip, it's the literal answer a simpleton would make. He saw someone throw a shoe once, it just happened to be moments before. The laughter was merely a polite, friendly thing to do in front of his new boss.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:38 am
by LoathedVermin72
cutuphalfdead wrote:It's not a quip, it's the literal answer a simpleton would make. He saw someone throw a shoe once, it just happened to be moments before. The laughter was merely a polite, friendly thing to do in front of his new boss.
A simpleton would not come up with that response. That's a real stretch for a joke. There isn't even really a joke there.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 4:39 am
by LoathedVermin72
The "once" wording makes no sense if that were true. "Once" deliberately makes it sound like it happened a while ago. He would just say "Yes" if he were referring to what just occurred.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 5:31 am
by Jorge
I will weigh in on this!!!
Are you ready?
Chud and Mecca
are
- Spoiler: show
- super wrong
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 12:15 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 1:26 pm
by LoathedVermin72
You guys are morons.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 1:53 pm
by Farmer John
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is an absurdist joke. The joke is that it's a silly, extremely specific question that would obviously warrant a negative response, but Homer does the unexpected and, ridiculously, answers positively.
I always thought of it like this and it didn't even occur to me that there was another interpretation until this whole thing came up.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 1:54 pm
by Farmer John
I'm going to go vote in the tournament now.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 5:19 pm
by Jorge
Farmer John wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is an absurdist joke. The joke is that it's a silly, extremely specific question that would obviously warrant a negative response, but Homer does the unexpected and, ridiculously, answers positively.
I always thought of it like this and it didn't even occur to me that there was another interpretation until this whole thing came up.
We have advanced brains.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 5:22 pm
by @SkitchP
Im with LV and Jorge on this one. The joke works better as an absurd albeit simple unexpected answer
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 10:43 pm
by bart
Yeah, I'm not sure how this is even a question. It's an ironically literal and specific punchline that begs a ton of questions in the same vein as Newman's "The Pacific Northwest!" line from Seinfeld.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:07 pm
by Mecca
guys, it is so much funnier as being about the action he just witnessed. I can see LV being that short-sighted but not the rest of you.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:08 pm
by Mecca
LoathedVermin72 wrote:The "once" wording makes no sense if that were true. "Once" deliberately makes it sound like it happened a while ago. He would just say "Yes" if he were referring to what just occurred.
if it happened before, he would say "yes, twice"
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:09 pm
by @SkitchP
Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:The "once" wording makes no sense if that were true. "Once" deliberately makes it sound like it happened a while ago. He would just say "Yes" if he were referring to what just occurred.
if it happened before, he would say "yes, twice"
There is no way Homer Simpson is indicating what he just witnessed counts, or he would have said so.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:10 pm
by Jorge
Mecca wrote:guys, it is so much funnier as being about the action he just witnessed. I can see LV being that short-sighted but not the rest of you.
Absolutely not. That would make it a literal, dull joke.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:11 pm
by Mecca
@SkitchP wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:The "once" wording makes no sense if that were true. "Once" deliberately makes it sound like it happened a while ago. He would just say "Yes" if he were referring to what just occurred.
if it happened before, he would say "yes, twice"
There is no way Homer Simpson is indicating what he just witnessed counts, or he would have said so.
i'm sorry that you don't get abstract comedy
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Fri June 17, 2016 11:12 pm
by @SkitchP
Mecca wrote:@SkitchP wrote:Mecca wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:The "once" wording makes no sense if that were true. "Once" deliberately makes it sound like it happened a while ago. He would just say "Yes" if he were referring to what just occurred.
if it happened before, he would say "yes, twice"
There is no way Homer Simpson is indicating what he just witnessed counts, or he would have said so.
i'm sorry that you don't get abstract comedy
Wouldn't that be absolute literal comedy at it's most obvious?