Red Mosquito

McParadigm wrote:

What a joke

Strat also disapproves.

Goddamn liberal millennial no gooders!

If they would work but can't due to increased risk for them and/or their family I think it makes sense. Isn’t it a way around the liability question for employers?

tragabigzanda wrote:

elliseamos wrote:If they would work but can't due to increased risk for them and/or their family I think it makes sense. Isn’t it a way around the liability question for employers?

I guess what id love to see is some sort of “doctor’s note” oversight, whereby you’ve got to at least jump through some minimal hoops to demonstrate you or a close family member are high risk

If im not mistaken, for most unemployment claims you have to at least check in and show proof that you have been job hunting. So there is reason to stand there should also be some oversight to this as well.

Nah forget oversight it's your duty as Americans to milk the government dry. Exploit.Exploit.Exploit.

Strat wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

elliseamos wrote:If they would work but can't due to increased risk for them and/or their family I think it makes sense. Isn’t it a way around the liability question for employers?

I guess what id love to see is some sort of “doctor’s note” oversight, whereby you’ve got to at least jump through some minimal hoops to demonstrate you or a close family member are high risk

If im not mistaken, for most unemployment claims you have to at least check in and show proof that you have been job hunting. So there is reason to stand there should also be some oversight to this as well.

This is my assumption as well.

You only need to look at the teachers who are contorting themselves to rationalize staying in their jammies for the rest of their lives to understand why this sort of broad policy will be a disaster. A lot of people aren't scared, they're fucking lazy.

Hey look, everyone! Verb is still being dumb!

verb_to_trust wrote:You only need to look at the teachers who are contorting themselves to rationalize staying in their jammies for the rest of their lives to understand why this sort of broad policy will be a disaster. A lot of people aren't scared, they're fucking lazy.

You know any teachers verb? Because about the 50 i know all fucking hate teaching from home and miss being int he classroom and taking care of their students.

elliseamos wrote:Hey look, everyone! Verb is still being dumb!

Verb isn't even trying anymore

Surely you guys realise that you just may need to change some attitudes and try some different options to work towards getting this thing under some form of control?

Now is the time for trying some different options. Yep, some will take advantage, but to my mind this is finally a move that actually puts corona management above economic management. That's a required temporary re-set.

Perfect policy doesn't exist here, you can only try to provide different options that allow people to choose safer behaviours wherever possible.

elliseamos wrote:

Strat wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

elliseamos wrote:If they would work but can't due to increased risk for them and/or their family I think it makes sense. Isn’t it a way around the liability question for employers?

I guess what id love to see is some sort of “doctor’s note” oversight, whereby you’ve got to at least jump through some minimal hoops to demonstrate you or a close family member are high risk

If im not mistaken, for most unemployment claims you have to at least check in and show proof that you have been job hunting. So there is reason to stand there should also be some oversight to this as well.

This is my assumption as well.

Not only that, but also this is the nationalizing of a policy that has existed in many states since jump.

The Trump administration left it up to states to decide if, for example, presenting documentation that your child is receiving chemotherapy is enough for you to refuse to work in a meat packing plant and still receive unemployment.

BurtReynolds wrote:Nah forget oversight it's your duty as Americans to milk the government dry. Exploit.Exploit.Exploit.

lol the BurtReynolds account and the quest for more oversight

McParadigm wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Nah forget oversight it's your duty as Americans to milk the government dry. Exploit.Exploit.Exploit.

lol the BurtReynolds account and the quest for more oversight

I wasn't being sarcastic. I want no oversight on any of these bread-and-circus programs.

Speaking of free money...

Where the fuck is my 2000 stimmy, Biden? Where is it?

Strat wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:You only need to look at the teachers who are contorting themselves to rationalize staying in their jammies for the rest of their lives to understand why this sort of broad policy will be a disaster. A lot of people aren't scared, they're fucking lazy.

You know any teachers verb? Because about the 50 i know all fucking hate teaching from home and miss being int he classroom and taking care of their students.

Do you even CPS bruh?