Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Tue August 27, 2019 10:19 pm
That's a bad faith response.
Oh, did you mean does literally every transitioning person (including those who are not on hormones whatsoever) have an altered medico-biological reality than their pre-transitioning state? That sounds like a reasonable reading of my post.BurtReynolds wrote:That's a bad faith response.
What was the reasonable reading of the bolded part of bi_3's post in your mind?Mickey wrote:Oh, did you mean does literally every transitioning person (including those who are not on hormones whatsoever) have an altered medico-biological reality than their pre-transitioning state? That sounds like a reasonable reading of my post.BurtReynolds wrote:That's a bad faith response.
That it's a false and totalizing claim made by a dipshit in support of an ultimately bigoted line of questioning.BurtReynolds wrote:What was the reasonable reading of the bolded part of bi_3's post in your mind?Mickey wrote:Oh, did you mean does literally every transitioning person (including those who are not on hormones whatsoever) have an altered medico-biological reality than their pre-transitioning state? That sounds like a reasonable reading of my post.BurtReynolds wrote:That's a bad faith response.
There is no process by which a Y chromosome can be replicated throughout functioning systems in the female body. This significant difference in hormone production and sensitivity cannot be overcome by existing therapeutic methods. All we can do is trigger cells to produce a subset of secondary sec characteristics associated with the Y chromosomeMickey wrote:Again, students who haven't done the reading don't get to participate in the discussion, but oh my fucking god yes it does.Bi_3 wrote:Transitioning does not alter the reality of biological differences and that medical treatment options and approaches can vary by sex.Mickey wrote:That it's a bad faith question and should be ignored.Bi_3 wrote:Mickey wrote:Tfw the student has not done the reading but still thinks he has some good ideas.Bi_3 wrote:If someone marks a biological sex on a medical form when they are genetically the other, should the doctor not believe the form?Mickey wrote:No worries brother, I can help you with that:Bi_3 wrote:Not sure what to think about this:
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out ... s-n1006466
“Medical training should include exposure to transgender patients” so health workers are better able to meet their needs, Wexler said. “A lot of doctors who are practicing didn’t have that in their training” but can still learn from such patients now.
What was your answer to the question?

those are just high schools with ashtrays, burt..BurtReynolds wrote:Community college is just as good.

That was Sunday, before the verdict.Anders wrote:Happy about the Supreme Court verdict.
I didn't meant to imply that you needed to, sorry.tree_ wrote:oh.. didn't read through the whole thread sorry
Jesus, how can you listen to that. I passed out at 1:22.tree_ wrote:actually it was brought up in this very good conversation
Really? Because all of your posts pretty much reek of patronizing sarcasm, including that one.tree_ wrote:when these people say something I take it very seriously