Page 23 of 27

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:08 am
by BurtReynolds
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:How exactly was it 'teed up' for a sequel, btw?
Think about it
tesseracts?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:10 am
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:McConaghey said in a recent interview that this ending certainly leaves it "teed up for a sequel".

I will say, the one thing that was great about this movie was all the theory in it. I still find myself thinking about how it all worked/could work.
what did you think about the "an hour on this planet costs us 7 years in earth time" relativity?
I have some questions about it, like why did the guy orbiting that planet age in earth years?
they purposefully kept the main ship out of the time-altering influence.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:11 am
by E.H. Ruddock
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:How exactly was it 'teed up' for a sequel, btw?
Think about it
tesseracts?
No. The planet they went to

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:12 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:McConaghey said in a recent interview that this ending certainly leaves it "teed up for a sequel".

I will say, the one thing that was great about this movie was all the theory in it. I still find myself thinking about how it all worked/could work.
what did you think about the "an hour on this planet costs us 7 years in earth time" relativity?
I have some questions about it, like why did the guy orbiting that planet age in earth years?
they purposefully kept the main ship out of the time-altering influence.
But wasn't he just orbiting that planet? So if the planet was in the black hole time altering influence, wouldn't it's orbit be also?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:13 am
by BurtReynolds
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:How exactly was it 'teed up' for a sequel, btw?
Think about it
tesseracts?
No. The planet they went to
I was gonna make a Loki joke, but wasn't the planet named Loki?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:16 am
by BurtReynolds
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:McConaghey said in a recent interview that this ending certainly leaves it "teed up for a sequel".

I will say, the one thing that was great about this movie was all the theory in it. I still find myself thinking about how it all worked/could work.
what did you think about the "an hour on this planet costs us 7 years in earth time" relativity?
I have some questions about it, like why did the guy orbiting that planet age in earth years?
they purposefully kept the main ship out of the time-altering influence.
But wasn't he just orbiting that planet? So if the planet was in the black hole time altering influence, wouldn't it's orbit be also?
In orbit perpendicular to the black hole's field? Not that it makes any more sense, but anyway.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:22 am
by E.H. Ruddock
I don't know. Just seems like anything associated with that planet would have the same time effect. Like if there was a moon orbiting that planet the time works be the same as on that planet, right?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:34 am
by BurtReynolds
this the best i could do, but its still stupid,

Image

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 12:40 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Yeah i guess that makes sense

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 3:29 am
by Bob Loblaw
BurtReynolds wrote:this the best i could do, but its still stupid,

Image
I want to make a large printout of this and hang it on my wall.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 2:12 pm
by Alex
BurtReynolds wrote:this the best i could do, but its still stupid,

Image
burt, if you don't draw us some cool-looking creatures i'm going to knock my milk over on my coloring book

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 5:17 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
That illustration actually cleared things up for me.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 5:17 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
*some

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 6:20 pm
by BurtReynolds
Hold on. I'm consulting with NASA to make sure. There may be some problems.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 6:45 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Well?

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 6:50 pm
by BurtReynolds
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Well?
You can't rush science, ruddo.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 6:54 pm
by Alex
draw a cool scary dude with sharp teeth and wings

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 7:05 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
BurtReynolds wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Well?
You can't rush science, ruddo.
I have an issue with humans being able to survive on any planet within the pull of a black hole. The spaghetti effect would take place.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 7:08 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Also, since I've been researching this extensively since I saw the movie, the time differential wouldn't be that great if they were somehow able to survive being near the black hole.

Re: Interstellar (Nolan)

Posted: Tue December 02, 2014 7:39 pm
by malice
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Also, since I've been researching this extensively since I saw the movie, the time differential wouldn't be that great if they were somehow able to survive being near the black hole.
my sister and brother in law both experience great difficulty in understanding space/time differentials.
entire dinner conversations have revolved around it.
i suggested the both read more science fiction after my brother in law basically told me the entire plot of interstellar, and then asked if i was planning on seeing it :/