Page 23 of 32

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 8:49 pm
by epilogue
Oh boy...

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 8:52 pm
by run2death
Why in the world would a 95-minute runtime be a bad thing?

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 8:55 pm
by epilogue
It's an epic story. They're already cramming a ton of stuff together (they've implied we'll see elements from all 7 books in this thing). The short running time just makes me worry that there won't be enough time spent developing the world and the characters. I'm worried it's gonna be a longer version of the trailer now: all action set pieces and no wonder or subtlety.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 8:56 pm
by epilogue
Many of my favorite films are on the longer side, too. I tend to like a longer running time, in general.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 9:01 pm
by run2death
Most modern sci-fi/fantasy movies are far too long in my opinion.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 9:06 pm
by epilogue
I don't necessarily disagree with you there. This... this is different, though. It really should have been a tv series.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 9:12 pm
by Monkey_Driven
durdencommatyler wrote:It's an epic story. They're already cramming a ton of stuff together (they've implied we'll see elements from all 7 books in this thing). The short running time just makes me worry that there won't be enough time spent developing the world and the characters. I'm worried it's gonna be a longer version of the trailer now: all action set pieces and no wonder or subtlety.
This is my prediction...

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 9:51 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 10:01 pm
by stip
Given how convoluted this world and story are I am surprised to see such a trim runtime

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 1:28 am
by wease
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
God, I hope not.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 2:04 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 3:43 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 3:44 pm
by epilogue
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 3:48 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 3:48 pm
by epilogue
tragabigzanda wrote:Ah, got ya. Thanks Joey. I hope you have an awesome day.
Hey thanks, friend. And the same to you!

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 5:13 pm
by wease
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.
Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 8:22 pm
by epilogue
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.
Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!
Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 8:35 pm
by bada
Sad to say but my interest in this has plummeted.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 9:12 pm
by wease
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.
Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!
Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.
We're RM. Of course we want to talk about it. We'll talk about monkeys fucking for a nickel.

Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower

Posted: Thu July 20, 2017 9:13 pm
by epilogue
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)

If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.
Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!
Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.
We're RM. Of course we want to talk about it. We'll talk about monkeys fucking for a nickel.
:haha: