Re: Stephen King's The Dark Tower
Posted: Wed July 19, 2017 8:49 pm
Oh boy...
This is my prediction...durdencommatyler wrote:It's an epic story. They're already cramming a ton of stuff together (they've implied we'll see elements from all 7 books in this thing). The short running time just makes me worry that there won't be enough time spent developing the world and the characters. I'm worried it's gonna be a longer version of the trailer now: all action set pieces and no wonder or subtlety.
God, I hope not.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.tragabigzanda wrote:I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?durdencommatyler wrote:Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Hey thanks, friend. And the same to you!tragabigzanda wrote:Ah, got ya. Thanks Joey. I hope you have an awesome day.
Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!durdencommatyler wrote:Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.tragabigzanda wrote:I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?durdencommatyler wrote:Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.wease wrote:Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!durdencommatyler wrote:Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.tragabigzanda wrote:I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?durdencommatyler wrote:Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
We're RM. Of course we want to talk about it. We'll talk about monkeys fucking for a nickel.durdencommatyler wrote:Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.wease wrote:Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!durdencommatyler wrote:Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.tragabigzanda wrote:I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?durdencommatyler wrote:Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).
wease wrote:We're RM. Of course we want to talk about it. We'll talk about monkeys fucking for a nickel.durdencommatyler wrote:Oh, do you really not know? And do you want to know? Cuz I'll spoiler tag the fuck out of it if you guys really want to talk about this.wease wrote:Then put a spoiler tag in there, m'boy!durdencommatyler wrote:Well, yeah, that's all part of what's wrapped up in what I said before about there being an awesome reason/justification for all of this but that it's a spoiler to get into it.tragabigzanda wrote:I thought they said this movie was more like a sequel?durdencommatyler wrote:Well... what they're doing is sort of a mash-up. This movie doesn't follow the first book and only the first book. They're staring in the middle and pulling aspects from all the books to tell this one story. (There's actually a really fucking awesome reason/justification for this but I can't talk about it without spoiling things.)E.H. Ruddock wrote:Wait so they are only doing this whole series in one movie?!
If this movie does well, they plan on making more of them. But they want to know there's hunger for a franchise. Last I heard, the plan was still to make three films and do a TV series that fills in the rest (mostly backstory with a young Roland).