Re: Anybody want a Corona?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2020 5:28 pm


Wait. Did you just agree with me?Bi_3 wrote:This what they should have done
This is a popular way of thinking.Mickey wrote:Whatever do you mean that the law is not an adequate means for redressing grievances??

If it were me, I would simply not lump right-wing anti-statism together with a progressive critique of the presumption of juridical equality so as to reify foundational notions of liberal sovereignty even as the erosion of their material basis is on full display.Bi_3 wrote:This is a popular way of thinking.Mickey wrote:Whatever do you mean that the law is not an adequate means for redressing grievances??
I think I'd hire bammer as council. He has experience with the suing biz.Bi_3 wrote:If they are committing fraud, it's best they get a lawyer.McParadigm wrote:lol yeah just get a lawyer
You kiss your mother with that mouth?Mickey wrote:If it were me, I would simply not lump right-wing anti-statism together with a progressive critique of the presumption of juridical equality so as to reify foundational notions of liberal sovereignty even as the erosion of their material basis is on full display.Bi_3 wrote:This is a popular way of thinking.Mickey wrote:Whatever do you mean that the law is not an adequate means for redressing grievances??
Not with any particular frequency.bada wrote:You kiss your mother with that mouth?Mickey wrote:If it were me, I would simply not lump right-wing anti-statism together with a progressive critique of the presumption of juridical equality so as to reify foundational notions of liberal sovereignty even as the erosion of their material basis is on full display.Bi_3 wrote:This is a popular way of thinking.Mickey wrote:Whatever do you mean that the law is not an adequate means for redressing grievances??
Lawsuit indemnificationBi_3 wrote:B wrote:I assume the button is right next to the one for employees to report employers who try to force them back to work without taking proper protections against Coronavirus.Bi_3 wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:this should be really popular at the polls!McParadigm wrote:Ohio has officially gone live with its website for employers, used to report employees as refusing to work so they can be stripped of unemployment benefits.
https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/lo ... lgCRf1lWI/
"As Ohio begins the process of reopening workplaces shuttered because of the coronavirus pandemic, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services has created a tool for employers to report employees who quit or refuse to return to work and attempt to collect unemployment."
It's anti-fraud tool the conforms to state law, similar to how you can report other kinds of fraudulent activity.
That's what personal injury lawyers are for, cause you know that shit is coming fast and furious.

But what if we eliminate sanctuary cities?Rob wrote:I've got 3 elementary school aged kids, and a wife who's still working. No school, no child care, grandparents obviously can't help. Not really feasible for me to go back to work in 2 weeks when my state opens. So I'm just gonna cross my fingers and hope my state doesn't try to force me back.
This is much more common than we think. What is your employer's policy?Rob wrote:I've got 3 elementary school aged kids, and a wife who's still working. No school, no child care, grandparents obviously can't help. Not really feasible for me to go back to work in 2 weeks when my state opens. So I'm just gonna cross my fingers and hope my state doesn't try to force me back.