Re: NHL Thread
Posted: Fri June 04, 2021 10:05 am
That was my initial thought, but then I watched it many more times and it's an amazing shot.Mickey wrote:Softy for sure. One you'd like to have back.
That was my initial thought, but then I watched it many more times and it's an amazing shot.Mickey wrote:Softy for sure. One you'd like to have back.
I never saw that coming. I do wonder how they’ll fare against teams that play at pace with grit, like Tampa, Colorado or Vegas. Until then, if you’re a Hans fan enjoy.elliseamos wrote:Montreal, huh?
yea i stopped paying attention only to realize that Vegas is on the verge of taking it. WTF.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Really surprised about this Vegas/Colorado series so far.
It’s not Rask’s fault that the Bruins have no depth on D.elliseamos wrote:For all his stats, the guy really knows how to come up short.
Enjoy the next phase Tuukka Rask.
That's false. Carlo & McAvoy are arguably top 2 anywhere. They banked on Charlie being elite this year, but he's got time yet.surfndestroy wrote:Tukka's good enough to win a cup with. The paper thin blue line was the issue. They tried addressing that by getting Riley but it's obvious now that a second D at the trade deadline was needed.
I put responsibility for the playoff exit on the front office. They never even tried to replace Krug with a capable player (until Riley) and they had their fingers crossed that Miller would defy medical reality and be able to play every game in the playoffs. I'm not sure Bruins number two D-man is a top four on any of the remaining teams.
Correct only insofar as you can argue anything, even if you're wildly wrong! They're good defensemen, both of them, and maybe they make the top four of some of the remaining teams, but are they replacing the top pairing on Tampa, Colorado, Vegas? No, no, and no.elliseamos wrote:That's false. Carlo & McAvoy are arguably top 2 anywhere.
I think that's true. And yet the same could be said of someone like Holtby, who I think of as a very similarly good, not great, goaltender. So I think both you and snd are correct, to an extent. The Bruins blue line was decimated by injuries--Carlo is massive hole! And yet it's also a thinner back-end than they've had in previous years, so while it's impossible to predict those kinds of things, not going after a defensive upgrade (the way the Lightning grabbed Savard) might look like a mistake, in hindsight.Tuukka has benefitted from good teams. He's really good, but he's missing a key ingredient to be great. Their depth was fine provided 5 guys didn't go down. Carlo, Miller, Zboril, Moore, and Kampfer were all out. The first two being the most significant losses.
fair points both. I am fine with the Bs top pair being 4th best in the league and I also wished the Bs had circumvented the cap to go all in. I don't mention it because I'm sour, I say it wholeheartedly: I want the Bruins to spend beyond the cap however they need to in order to win a cup.Mickey wrote:Correct only insofar as you can argue anything, even if you're wildly wrong! They're good defensemen, both of them, and maybe they make the top four of some of the remaining teams, but are they replacing the top pairing on Tampa, Colorado, Vegas? No, no, and no.elliseamos wrote:That's false. Carlo & McAvoy are arguably top 2 anywhere.
I think that's true. And yet the same could be said of someone like Holtby, who I think of as a very similarly good, not great, goaltender. So I think both you and snd are correct, to an extent. The Bruins blue line was decimated by injuries--Carlo is massive hole! And yet it's also a thinner back-end than they've had in previous years, so while it's impossible to predict those kinds of things, not going after a defensive upgrade (the way the Lightning grabbed Savard) might look like a mistake, in hindsight.Tuukka has benefitted from good teams. He's really good, but he's missing a key ingredient to be great. Their depth was fine provided 5 guys didn't go down. Carlo, Miller, Zboril, Moore, and Kampfer were all out. The first two being the most significant losses.