Page 223 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 5:52 pm
by Norah
I just hate .255 batting averages.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 6:01 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
cutuphalfdead wrote:I just hate .255 batting averages.
Dat OPS though. Agreed it is weird to see an average that low. He did hit .301 in 2013. So I don't see why he can't hit .280 with like 30-35 homers this year in more of a hitters park.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 6:05 pm
by Norah
BigRedLedbetter wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I just hate .255 batting averages.
Dat OPS though. Agreed it is weird to see an average that low. He did hit .301 in 2013. So I don't see why he can't hit .280 with like 30-35 homers this year in more of a hitters park.
His OPS also dropped like 80 points from the year before. We'll see where it settles.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 6:08 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
I don't think he was as good as 2013 or as (whatever word you want to use) for 2014. Somewhere in the middle. He will be 29 in a few weeks. It will be interesting to see how his career goes but I can see 2-3 really good years in Toronto.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 6:11 pm
by Norah
Yeah, he's also a 29 year old with the service time of a 25 year old.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 6:43 pm
by numbers
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.
Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 7:07 pm
by @SkitchP
Rumors swirling about Cespedes for Porcello.


I dont think I like that.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 7:09 pm
by Norah
Yeah I heard that rumor last week. Cespedes is rumored to involved with in all sorts of trades right now.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 8:57 pm
by Lament
BigRedLedbetter wrote:The Lament Sox trying to get Shark.
I really didn't think they'd start making moves of this nature till next winter, but man was I wrong. I guess they think they're much closer than I do.

A Sale-Samardzija-Rodon-Quintana-Danks rotation would be more than formidable. Duke would be the only really reliable bullpen arm though.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 9:48 pm
by philpritchard
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.
Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.
I don't think that's remotely close to Lawrie's value.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 9:55 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Lament wrote:
BigRedLedbetter wrote:The Lament Sox trying to get Shark.

A Sale-Samardzija-Rodon-Quintana-Danks rotation would be more than formidable. Duke would be the only really reliable bullpen arm though.

If/when Rodon is ready that could be a damn fine rotation.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 10:30 pm
by numbers
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.
Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.
I don't think that's remotely close to Lawrie's value.
I think your vastly overstating Lawrie's value.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 10:50 pm
by philpritchard
Lawrie's a 24 year old who's averaged 3.4 WAR per 600 plate appearances. Middlebrooks is a 26 year old who's averaged 1.0 WAR per 600 plate appearances. I don't think one year of Napoli at $16 million to fill a position they don't need closes that gap.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 10:58 pm
by @SkitchP
So the Top of the Blue Jays lineup is amazing.

The bottom is scary.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 11:06 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Mmmmm Napoli. :D

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 11:11 pm
by philpritchard
@SkitchP wrote:So the Top of the Blue Jays lineup is amazing.

The bottom is scary.
Absolutely. They're both scary in opposite ways. If they add Melky and/or a decent 2B, it would really balance things out.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun November 30, 2014 2:45 pm
by Coach
I get why the Sox likely have to part with Cespedes, but it just doesn't feel right.

Also, Wade Boggs at Fenway...there was NOTHING like watching that guy hit. The eye-hand coordination, the discipline, use of the wall, etc. The occasional homer over right field.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun November 30, 2014 3:31 pm
by BigRedLedbetter
Coach wrote:I get why the Sox likely have to part with Cespedes, but it just doesn't feel right.

Also, Wade Boggs at Fenway...there was NOTHING like watching that guy hit. The eye-hand coordination, the discipline, use of the wall, etc. The occasional homer over right field.
I am 34 so I did not see Boggs in his prime much but I remember some. Pretty sure the only down year in Boston he was going through a divorce. Such a stud and very underrated hitter all time. So many great hitters from my youth Gwynn, Boggs, Brett, Puckett, Mattingly, etc. Good memories.

Boggs was born in Omaha and did a signing there when I was a kid. I missed it and wish I had gone.

Boggs also drank 64 Miller Lites on a Cross-country Flight. Which is legendary.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun November 30, 2014 4:26 pm
by Simple Torture
My brother and father went to the game where Boggs got his 2000th hit; it was my brother's first game, but I was "too young" to go :gomez:

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon December 01, 2014 7:27 pm
by Norah
So the Mariners just got a little better.