Re: MLB
Posted: Sat November 29, 2014 5:52 pm
I just hate .255 batting averages.
Dat OPS though. Agreed it is weird to see an average that low. He did hit .301 in 2013. So I don't see why he can't hit .280 with like 30-35 homers this year in more of a hitters park.cutuphalfdead wrote:I just hate .255 batting averages.
His OPS also dropped like 80 points from the year before. We'll see where it settles.BigRedLedbetter wrote:Dat OPS though. Agreed it is weird to see an average that low. He did hit .301 in 2013. So I don't see why he can't hit .280 with like 30-35 homers this year in more of a hitters park.cutuphalfdead wrote:I just hate .255 batting averages.
Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.philpritchard wrote:I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
I really didn't think they'd start making moves of this nature till next winter, but man was I wrong. I guess they think they're much closer than I do.BigRedLedbetter wrote:The Lament Sox trying to get Shark.
I don't think that's remotely close to Lawrie's value.numbers wrote:Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.philpritchard wrote:I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
Lament wrote:BigRedLedbetter wrote:The Lament Sox trying to get Shark.
A Sale-Samardzija-Rodon-Quintana-Danks rotation would be more than formidable. Duke would be the only really reliable bullpen arm though.
I think your vastly overstating Lawrie's value.philpritchard wrote:I don't think that's remotely close to Lawrie's value.numbers wrote:Well Middlebrooks and a year of Napoli might have been enough to make up for Lawrie.philpritchard wrote:I don't think they had a piece like Lawrie to give up though unless they dealt Betts or Bogaerts.numbers wrote:The Red Sox should have tried to get Donaldson and Shark from Oakland, it might have been doable without giving up Betts or Owens.
Absolutely. They're both scary in opposite ways. If they add Melky and/or a decent 2B, it would really balance things out.@SkitchP wrote:So the Top of the Blue Jays lineup is amazing.
The bottom is scary.
I am 34 so I did not see Boggs in his prime much but I remember some. Pretty sure the only down year in Boston he was going through a divorce. Such a stud and very underrated hitter all time. So many great hitters from my youth Gwynn, Boggs, Brett, Puckett, Mattingly, etc. Good memories.Coach wrote:I get why the Sox likely have to part with Cespedes, but it just doesn't feel right.
Also, Wade Boggs at Fenway...there was NOTHING like watching that guy hit. The eye-hand coordination, the discipline, use of the wall, etc. The occasional homer over right field.