Page 226 of 472

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sat August 27, 2016 10:59 pm
by epilogue
People sure do use "no sense of humor" as a way of justifying being an asshole, though.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 2:48 am
by BurtReynolds
durdencommatyler wrote:People sure do use "no sense of humor" as a way of justifying being an asshole, though.
the same way people use being offended by everything as a way to justify being an asshole.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 2:54 am
by 96583UP
BurtReynolds wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:People sure do use "no sense of humor" as a way of justifying being an asshole, though.
the same way people use being offended by everything as a way to justify being an asshole.
Image

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 2:55 am
by BurtReynolds
It's like poetry. It rhymes.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 3:12 am
by 96583UP
40 years from now, when my paltry attempt at retirement savings has been exhausted and I am taking out a reverse mortgage solely to pay for exorbitant medical bills, I will look back and be satisfied that my generation did everything that it could to focus on the important issues facing this country

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Sun August 28, 2016 7:07 pm
by B
I liked this article written to the "i can't vote for either people."

It lists Hillary's accomplishments in public service.
-First ever student commencement speaker at Wellesley College.
-Distinguished graduate of Yale Law School.
-Editorial board of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action.
-Co-founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families.
-Former civil litigation attorney.
-Staff attorney for Children’s Defense Fund.
-Faculty member in the School of Law at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
-Former Director of the Arkansas Legal Aid Clinic.
-First female chair of the Legal Services Corporation.
-First female partner at Rose Law Firm, the oldest and one of the largest law firms in Arkansas.
-Twice named by The National Law Journal as one of the 100 Most Influential Lawyers in America.
-Former First Lady of Arkansas.
-Arkansas Woman of the Year in 1983.
-Chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession.
-Created Arkansas’s Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth.
-Instrumental in passage of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.
-First Lady of the United States.
-Promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses.
-Successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health.
-Worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War (now recognized as Gulf War Syndrome).
-Helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice.
-Initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act.
-First FLOTUS in US History to hold a postgraduate degree.
-Helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries.
-Two-term New York Senator and the first ex-FLOTUS in US History to be elected to the United States Senate.
-Served on five Senate committees: Budget (2001–2002), Armed Services (2003–2009), Environment and Public Works (2001–2009), Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (2001–2009) and the Special Committee on Aging.
-Member of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.
-Leading role in investigating the health issues faced by 9/11 first responders.
-Worked with Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York on securing $21.4 billion in funding for the World Trade Center redevelopment.
-Former United States Secretary of State.
-Brokered a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas in 2012.
And his plans for the presidency.
-Building a wall across the southern border that Mexico is supposedly going to pay for.
-The deportation, by force if necessary, of 11 million undocumented immigrants (and stop saying “illegal”, you jackass).
-Banning and deporting all members of a religious faith that total over 1 billion adherents worldwide, even if they are American citizens, because “everybody knows” they’re just a bunch of murdering terrorists.
-Lists among his associates known white supremacists and eugenicists.
-Speaks admiringly of ruthless foreign despots and encourages espionage against the United States by hostile governments.
-Ruminates about not defending our NATO allies against Russian invasion.
-States openly and freely that using nuclear weapons should always be an option to make him more “unpredictable”.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 12:34 am
by McParadigm
Yeah, but has H-Dawg ever paused mid-speech to literally hug an American flag? The way an awkward, fat child hugs an uncle who is doing nothing to show any sign of reciprocated affection?

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 12:43 am
by Simple Torture
Spoiler: show
Image

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 1:47 am
by McParadigm
Make America love you the way he did before he had kids of his own again

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 1:57 am
by 96583UP
debate moderators still undecided due to concern over Trump accusing them of bias

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/24/media/d ... oderators/


maybe bo jackson can do it

he can do everything

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 3:05 am
by BurtReynolds
November can't come soon enough.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 10:22 am
by Bi_3
96583UP wrote:debate moderators still undecided due to concern over Trump accusing them of bias

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/24/media/d ... oderators/


maybe bo jackson can do it

he can do everything

Well, to be honest, CNN hasn't been the least bit impartial for going on a year now. Even NPR and Facebook got in the act this weekend by censoring Jill Stein's criticism of Hillary and the fucking disastrous TPP.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 3:02 pm
by Electromatic
Honestly, what's the point in having a debate?

Everyone who wants to decide has decided. It's just a gigantic waste of time.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 3:59 pm
by Green Habit
Electromatic wrote:Honestly, what's the point in having a debate?

Everyone who wants to decide has decided. It's just a gigantic waste of time.
Spoiler: show
Image

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 5:36 pm
by McParadigm
They've certainly become less and less impactful as the public has grown increasingly entrenched/protected in its opinions, less patient, less informed, and more inclined to evaluate the candidates as celebrities rather than invest the time required to even know what their actual policies are, let alone the rationale or research around them.

Ironically, this is the same public that then becomes jaded with the results of each election they treated as a combination of football game/reality tv show, and mistakenly equates that skepticism with some kind of experiential insight or wisdom...thus leading to yet more of the above behaviors.

The debates used to be valuable because you couldn't buy them, you couldn't control them, and you couldn't say a bunch of nothing without SOUNDING like you were saying nothing. Now, they're mostly just chances for each side to take two or three sound bytes that they will ad-play out of context for a few weeks on end, as a get out the vote effort for a public that knew who they were voting for on day one.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 5:50 pm
by BurtReynolds
Huma's husband was dicks out for harambe and now he's the bad guy. Stupid media.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 7:27 pm
by Electromatic
McParadigm wrote:They've certainly become less and less impactful as the public has grown increasingly entrenched/protected in its opinions, less patient, less informed, and more inclined to evaluate the candidates as celebrities rather than invest the time required to even know what their actual policies are, let alone the rationale or research around them.

Ironically, this is the same public that then becomes jaded with the results of each election they treated as a combination of football game/reality tv show, and mistakenly equates that skepticism with some kind of experiential insight or wisdom...thus leading to yet more of the above behaviors.

The debates used to be valuable because you couldn't buy them, you couldn't control them, and you couldn't say a bunch of nothing without SOUNDING like you were saying nothing. Now, they're mostly just chances for each side to take two or three sound bytes that they will ad-play out of context for a few weeks on end, as a get out the vote effort for a public that knew who they were voting for on day one.

It sure would be nice if that were the case honestly during the primary process, before we even get to this point. Have a few small debates not just with members of the same party, perhaps no in room audience, maybe even a few stock or public write in questions chosen from a list, maybe a few different targeted demographics to speak to (college age, retirees, working class, business leaders etc.) not all in the same debate. Almost a town hall, without the town being in the physical room. A time clock on the answer times and rebuttals etc.

It would be nice to try and de politicize the process somewhat and try and get into the details and sure maybe lose a few people by getting into the minutiae.

It's just frustrating that every statement is a headline now and or screaming. I want context. I want intelligent, respectful discourse much earlier in the process.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Mon August 29, 2016 11:46 pm
by B
Image

I post this for bada's benefit, since he rightfully shamed me on the last page.

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue August 30, 2016 12:10 am
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Election 2016

Posted: Tue August 30, 2016 12:11 am
by Jorge
B wrote:Image

I post this for bada's benefit, since he rightfully shamed me on the last page.
Is that real? I want to see the video. That can't be real