Re: Social Media: The God That Failed
Posted: Mon October 04, 2021 6:11 pm
brilliant
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, anyone see bammer lately?
I'm not sure what you mean here.Bi_3 wrote:As much as I'd love to see Instagram erased from this timeline, this is really not a great look for the entire global economy and the lengths companies will go to prevent this is in the future will probably not be pleasant for their employees.
"insider threat" policies. Always on cameras, mics, aggressive internet traffic surveillance, etc.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm not sure what you mean here.Bi_3 wrote:As much as I'd love to see Instagram erased from this timeline, this is really not a great look for the entire global economy and the lengths companies will go to prevent this is in the future will probably not be pleasant for their employees.
lolChris_H_2 wrote:brilliant
Is this an inside job? I have no idea.Bi_3 wrote:"insider threat" policies. Always on cameras, mics, aggressive internet traffic surveillance, etc.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm not sure what you mean here.Bi_3 wrote:As much as I'd love to see Instagram erased from this timeline, this is really not a great look for the entire global economy and the lengths companies will go to prevent this is in the future will probably not be pleasant for their employees.
Is there anything to the 60 minutes thing? The whistleblower wanted them to censor their users more? Makes Facebook seem like the good guys if thats all there is. 'Spreading hate and misinformation' = free communication, yeah?BurtReynolds wrote:Is this an inside job? I have no idea.Bi_3 wrote:"insider threat" policies. Always on cameras, mics, aggressive internet traffic surveillance, etc.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm not sure what you mean here.Bi_3 wrote:As much as I'd love to see Instagram erased from this timeline, this is really not a great look for the entire global economy and the lengths companies will go to prevent this is in the future will probably not be pleasant for their employees.
After the 60 Minutes report, they'll probably be spying on employees for that reason.
yeah pretty much.simple schoolboy wrote:Is there anything to the 60 minutes thing? The whistleblower wanted them to censor their users more? Makes Facebook seem like the good guys if thats all there is. 'Spreading hate and misinformation' = free communication, yeah?BurtReynolds wrote:Is this an inside job? I have no idea.Bi_3 wrote:"insider threat" policies. Always on cameras, mics, aggressive internet traffic surveillance, etc.BurtReynolds wrote:I'm not sure what you mean here.Bi_3 wrote:As much as I'd love to see Instagram erased from this timeline, this is really not a great look for the entire global economy and the lengths companies will go to prevent this is in the future will probably not be pleasant for their employees.
After the 60 Minutes report, they'll probably be spying on employees for that reason.
Driving engagement is fulfilling their fiduciary duty to stockholders. Its not clear to me the whistleblower is worthy of that title. 'I prefer we make the user experience worse, hurting the value of the company in the service of my political goals.'BurtReynolds wrote:I think the only valid complaint for me was that the algorithm promotes some messages over others. Facebook algorithm is very evil, but that's old news.
What they want is for the algorithm to promote shit MSM want promoted.
simple schoolboy wrote:Driving engagement is fulfilling their fiduciary duty to stockholders. Its not clear to me the whistleblower is worthy of that title. 'I prefer we make the user experience worse, hurting the value of the company in the service of my political goals.'BurtReynolds wrote:I think the only valid complaint for me was that the algorithm promotes some messages over others. Facebook algorithm is very evil, but that's old news.
What they want is for the algorithm to promote shit MSM want promoted.