Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sat April 20, 2013 8:53 pm
Why do we even have post counts?
Page 24 of 33
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sat April 20, 2013 8:54 pm
So spike can judge us.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sat April 20, 2013 8:55 pm
That guy has some nerve.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sat April 20, 2013 9:51 pm
carl
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sat April 20, 2013 9:56 pm
it's kind of like the k/d ratio stat in Call of Duty or other like games...pointless.durdencommatyler wrote:Why do we even have post counts?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun April 21, 2013 1:55 am
numbers wrote:I was going to write a snooty response to this, but then I remembered how I was rooting for that Dorner dude to escape in LA.red calzolaio wrote:i was actually rooting for this kid to get away.
oh well.
Did you two hope your respective anti-heroes would escape to kill more people or would it be like the end of a movie and they would cease to exist but in your hearts you knew they lived happily ever after?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun April 21, 2013 2:15 am
well, not really. The k/d ratio tells you how good the person is.red calzolaio wrote:it's kind of like the k/d ratio stat in Call of Duty or other like games...pointless.durdencommatyler wrote:Why do we even have post counts?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun April 21, 2013 2:41 am
at what? camping?numbers wrote:well, not really. The k/d ratio tells you how good the person is.red calzolaio wrote:it's kind of like the k/d ratio stat in Call of Duty or other like games...pointless.durdencommatyler wrote:Why do we even have post counts?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun April 21, 2013 3:38 am
ALred calzolaio wrote:at what? camping?numbers wrote:well, not really. The k/d ratio tells you how good the person is.red calzolaio wrote:it's kind of like the k/d ratio stat in Call of Duty or other like games...pointless.durdencommatyler wrote:Why do we even have post counts?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon April 22, 2013 11:56 pm
good read
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... z2REvFXit6
http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... ctors.html
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... z2REvFXit6
http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... ctors.html
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:10 am
Of course there was a private security detail working the marathon. I don't really understand what the point of this "article" was other than to whip government conspiracy nuts into a frenzy.psychobain wrote:good read
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... z2REvFXit6
http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... ctors.html
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:12 am
i stopped reading after:turned2black wrote:Of course there was a private security detail working the marathon. I don't really understand what the point of this "article" was other than to whip government conspiracy nuts into a frenzy.psychobain wrote:good read
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... z2REvFXit6
http://www.naturalnews.com/039977_The_C ... ctors.html
granted it was written Thursday, but still, pretty paranoid writing if you ask me.Only the alternative media is conducting real investigative journalism on these bombings. The mainstream media isn't interested in the truth; they only want to spin the attack into a new way to somehow blame conservative Americans for something they had no part in.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:13 am
I think the point of the article is the mainstream media isn't interested in talking about what he wants to talk about and that's bad.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:16 am
right.bada wrote:I think the point of the article is the mainstream media isn't interested in talking about what he wants to talk about and that's bad.
i couldn't help but read on:
ugh.The appearance of The Craft operatives at the Boston marathon bombing raises new questions about Chris Kyle's death
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:18 am
The conspiracy theories surrounding this are more laughable than normal.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:21 am
from that same "article"cutuphalfdead wrote:The conspiracy theories surrounding this are more laughable than normal.
What's in their backpacks? (A ham sandwich?)
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:27 am
Snark if you want but this guy is an alternative to the lamestream media. It's about the truth.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:33 am
bada wrote:Snark if you want but this guy is an alternative to the lamestream media. It's about the truth.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:40 am
What "truth" would that be exactly? For the "lamestream media" to publish this kind of conjecture would be ridiculously irresponsible and libelous.bada wrote:Snark if you want but this guy is an alternative to the lamestream media. It's about the truth.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue April 23, 2013 12:42 am
I'm pretty sure that post was tongue-in-cheek.turned2black wrote:What "truth" would that be exactly? For the "lamestream media" to publish this kind of conjecture would be ridiculously irresponsible and libelous.bada wrote:Snark if you want but this guy is an alternative to the lamestream media. It's about the truth.