Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)
Posted: Sun July 09, 2017 4:23 pm
Shireen it is!
cutuphalfdead wrote:To me Cersei's story with the faith militant didn't really amount to much. It was a minor inconvenience for her and now she's removed her (local) enemies and can go back to being psycho queen again. Once again, the show-runners have removed consequences and real adversity from the story. If she had to face trial at least it might have knocked her down a peg, and forced her to face some reckoning even if she came out victorious, but nope, she just got them all in the same room and let the deus ex wildfirina take care of her problems.stip wrote:Wiping out the principal ally of the Lannister's in the process, causing Tommen's suicide, and putting Cersci on the iron throne. That whole story arc was about Cersei, and reinforced and pushed even further both the strengths and weaknesses of her character going into the final act of the series.cutuphalfdead wrote:Until it didn't because they all died at once.Anders wrote:Can't agree on that. It changed everything in King's Landing.cutuphalfdead wrote:Me too. Because it didn't go anywhere.stip wrote:i was genuinely stunned by the conclusion of the faith militant storyline
she's dead too, petecutuphalfdead wrote:Shireen it is!
thanks for explaining the joke, marymalice wrote:she's dead too, petecutuphalfdead wrote:Shireen it is!
I don't think there's anyone left from the Stannis/Robert line except the bastard son they were going to sacrifice, correct?malice wrote:she's dead too, petecutuphalfdead wrote:Shireen it is!
Cersei did face consequences. Throughout this arc she was humbled and humiliated, she was removed from the small council, and alienated from her son and most of her remaining family. . The actions taken against her expose the weakness at the heart of House Lannister without Tywin in charge. She actually became a quasi sympathetic figure, to the point that you had to remind yourself that she brought this among herself. But, at the end of this arc what we learn is that, ultimately, Cersei learned nothing. She is a character beyond redemption, and of all the major character arcs, she is the only unambiguous villain (which puts Jamie in an interesting place).cutuphalfdead wrote:To me Cersei's story with the faith militant didn't really amount to much. It was a minor inconvenience for her and now she's removed her (local) enemies and can go back to being psycho queen again. Once again, the show-runners have removed consequences and real adversity from the story. If she had to face trial at least it might have knocked her down a peg, and forced her to face some reckoning even if she came out victorious, but nope, she just got them all in the same room and let the deus ex wildfirina take care of her problems.stip wrote:Wiping out the principal ally of the Lannister's in the process, causing Tommen's suicide, and putting Cersci on the iron throne. That whole story arc was about Cersei, and reinforced and pushed even further both the strengths and weaknesses of her character going into the final act of the series.cutuphalfdead wrote:Until it didn't because they all died at once.Anders wrote:Can't agree on that. It changed everything in King's Landing.cutuphalfdead wrote:Me too. Because it didn't go anywhere.stip wrote:i was genuinely stunned by the conclusion of the faith militant storyline
Funny you said that just after Stip explained why it did.malice wrote:Actually, while the destruction of the sept and tommens walk out the window were certainly shock excitement for the show, i also thought it was YET ANOTHER tremendous waste of time because the storyline was quite long but all ended in absolutely nothing, like with Stannis
to be fair, we posted at the same time or near enough, i didn't see his post until after I posted. I read his interpretation, and it has merit, but i don't appreciate how the show has this habit of extended storylines that dont have resolutions except everyone dies. If, as stip says, it's more about how cersie gets defined, or redefined as a character, i guess that's fine, but im left feeling unsatisfied by the journey?Anders wrote:Funny you said that just after Stip explained why it did.malice wrote:Actually, while the destruction of the sept and tommens walk out the window were certainly shock excitement for the show, i also thought it was YET ANOTHER tremendous waste of time because the storyline was quite long but all ended in absolutely nothing, like with Stannis
That's fair. I can certainly respect that. I on the other hand had a tear in an eye at the end of the season. Ten out ten.malice wrote:to be fair, we posted at the same time or near enough, i didn't see his post until after I posted. I read his interpretation, and it has merit, but i don't appreciate how the show has this habit of extended storylines that dont have resolutions except everyone dies. If, as stip says, it's more about how cersie gets defined, or redefined as a character, i guess that's fine, but im left feeling unsatisfied by the journey?Anders wrote:Funny you said that just after Stip explained why it did.malice wrote:Actually, while the destruction of the sept and tommens walk out the window were certainly shock excitement for the show, i also thought it was YET ANOTHER tremendous waste of time because the storyline was quite long but all ended in absolutely nothing, like with Stannis
Also, I don't see how much it redefines her. She was presented with adversity and it looked like she might have to go through some transformative reckoning to face it. Instead she just blows them all up. It wasn't just the Faith Militant too, it was the Tyrels that were extinguished. All it did was streamline everything so in the endgame she only has Dany to deal with in the south of the neck.malice wrote:to be fair, we posted at the same time or near enough, i didn't see his post until after I posted. I read his interpretation, and it has merit, but i don't appreciate how the show has this habit of extended storylines that dont have resolutions except everyone dies. If, as stip says, it's more about how cersie gets defined, or redefined as a character, i guess that's fine, but im left feeling unsatisfied by the journey?Anders wrote:Funny you said that just after Stip explained why it did.malice wrote:Actually, while the destruction of the sept and tommens walk out the window were certainly shock excitement for the show, i also thought it was YET ANOTHER tremendous waste of time because the storyline was quite long but all ended in absolutely nothing, like with Stannis
In the show world, not really. But--if the relations from the book are assumed to be the same as the novels--the answer may surprise you: it's Jon Snow. Robert's grandmother--Rhaelle Targaryen--was the aunt of The Mad King, making him Rhaegar/Dany's great-aunt, and relatively close in the blood line to Jon. There's some talk that Robert's great-grandfather may have had another daughter, but I still think Jon would be closer.malice wrote:I don't think there's anyone left from the Stannis/Robert line except the bastard son they were going to sacrifice, correct?malice wrote:she's dead too, petecutuphalfdead wrote:Shireen it is!
Jon's not trueborn though.Simple Torture wrote:In the show world, not really. But--if the relations from the book are assumed to be the same as the novels--the answer may surprise you: it's Jon Snow. Robert's grandmother--Rhaelle Targaryen--was the aunt of The Mad King, making him Rhaegar/Dany's great-aunt, and relatively close in the blood line to Jon. There's some talk that Robert's great-grandfather may have had another daughter, but I still think Jon would be closer.malice wrote:I don't think there's anyone left from the Stannis/Robert line except the bastard son they were going to sacrifice, correct?malice wrote:she's dead too, petecutuphalfdead wrote:Shireen it is!