Page 239 of 472
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 7:50 pm
by Bi_3
bune wrote:Bi_3 wrote:Where do we stand on the Hillary in-ear-receiver controversy?
This is like the inverse argument of "they're both horrible", isn't it? I don't care about an earpiece because Trump's done way worse shit.
I'm not following. this has nothing to with Trump.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 7:50 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 7:56 pm
by Bi_3
tragabigzanda wrote:Bi_3 wrote:bune wrote:Bi_3 wrote:Where do we stand on the Hillary in-ear-receiver controversy?
This is like the inverse argument of "they're both horrible", isn't it? I don't care about an earpiece because Trump's done way worse shit.
I'm not following. this has nothing to with Trump.
She was prolly just listening to the new Zack de la Rocha joint anyway.
Better than the Oberlin dorm RA they had feeding Bernie.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 8:32 pm
by B
We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 8:43 pm
by bune
Bi_3 wrote:bune wrote:Bi_3 wrote:Where do we stand on the Hillary in-ear-receiver controversy?
This is like the inverse argument of "they're both horrible", isn't it? I don't care about an earpiece because Trump's done way worse shit.
I'm not following. this has nothing to with Trump.
You're right, it doesn't. Nor does it have anything to do with the price of rice in China and yet here we are.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 8:46 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Thu September 08, 2016 11:38 pm
by verb_to_trust
What is Aleppo?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 12:03 am
by jwfocker
verb_to_trust wrote:What is Aleppo?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 12:05 am
by 96583UP
a ghettofied leper
where my leppos at?!?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 2:48 am
by McParadigm
B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
The thing is, she was doing and saying the opposite of what that earpiece was telling her. She was...I'm good with the body language, and what that earpiece's body language was showing me was that Clinton was saying the opposite of what it was telling her.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 5:44 am
by BurtReynolds
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 7:12 am
by simple schoolboy
BurtReynolds wrote:
Between this and Jill Stein's vandalism, I'm sure the third party candidates are just happy to get press. I'm sure the Peace and Freedom Party wishes they got this kind of press.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 12:51 pm
by B
McParadigm wrote:B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
The thing is, she was doing and saying the opposite of what that earpiece was telling her. She was...I'm good with the body language, and what that earpiece's body language was showing me was that Clinton was saying the opposite of what it was telling her.
The more i hear about people fussing over this, the more i think of Doc Ock with his arms talking to him.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 2:09 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
Well, she could be fed responses based on live social media analysis to make sure her base is responding or be given counterpoints or follow questions. Not sure she can get away with it at a real debate. Flopsy will probably check her ears when he struts onto stage.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 3:17 pm
by jwfocker
Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
Well, she could be fed responses based on live social media analysis to make sure her base is responding or be given counterpoints or follow questions. Not sure she can get away with it at a real debate. Flopsy will probably check her ears when he struts onto stage.
Sounds legit.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 3:47 pm
by Bi_3
jwfocker wrote:Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
Well, she could be fed responses based on live social media analysis to make sure her base is responding or be given counterpoints or follow questions. Not sure she can get away with it at a real debate. Flopsy will probably check her ears when he struts onto stage.
Sounds legit.
I'm passionate about my made-up bullshit.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 5:09 pm
by B
Bi_3 wrote:B wrote:We're really stretching here, aren't we?
I mean, it's not like she used a teleprompter or anything!
Well, she could be fed responses based on live social media analysis to make sure her base is responding or be given counterpoints or follow questions. Not sure she can get away with it at a real debate. Flopsy will probably check her ears when he struts onto stage.
Politicians don't give a shit to anyone outside of their base. She just stepped her game up. My only problem in the debates would be fairness. They should either both have them or neither of them have them.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 5:38 pm
by surfndestroy
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I can understand not knowing where Aleppo is if you are just joe schmoe RM user, as it isn't a capital city, so you may not have learned it in Geography class or World History class (although you probably should have), but if you are a candidate for President of the U.S. who is trying to swoop in and show the country how it would be better to vote for you than for H-Dog or Trump, then you should probably pride yourself on being even smarter than them on current issues, Syria being one of them.
If I was supposed to know where Aleppo is they would have put it on a Risk board.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 5:41 pm
by bune
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 09, 2016 6:03 pm
by McParadigm
Yeah the sources on this one were so absurd that I assume the people who bought in also believe every Facebook death hoax.