Page 25 of 44
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 1:21 pm
by McParadigm
I love that every conservative guerrilla tactic is predicated on other conservatives being dumb enough to believe anything
The woman was apparently part of an attempt by a right-wing fringe political group to embarrass the Democratic congresswoman. Late Thursday, a Twitter account belonging to the LaRouche PAC — which was founded by conspiracy theorist Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. — took credit for the stunt. A historian who has documented the organization said the woman’s outburst was “a fairly well-established tactic for them.”
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 1:22 pm
by McParadigm
Though I hate that they’re more or less correct
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 1:48 pm
by verb_to_trust
BurtReynolds wrote:Cats are very bad for the environment.
They are purrrfect creatures. Great company.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 3:54 pm
by Green Habit
Late Thursday, a Twitter account belonging to the LaRouche PAC — which was founded by conspiracy theorist Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. — took credit for the stunt. A historian who has documented the organization said the woman’s outburst was “a fairly well-established tactic for them.”

Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 3:54 pm
by bune
wow.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 5:30 pm
by Bi_3
I like how AOC backed off of flight shaming in the GND yet now that is a thing.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 6:06 pm
by Green Habit
Bi_3 wrote:I like how AOC backed off of flight shaming in the GND yet now that is a thing.
The flight shaming thing is so ridiculous.
Someone should retort with concrete shaming, since it's as difficult to replace as flying yet emits three times as many pollutants.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 6:07 pm
by bune
can win for losing all the time.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 6:31 pm
by BurtReynolds
Green Habit wrote:Bi_3 wrote:I like how AOC backed off of flight shaming in the GND yet now that is a thing.
The flight shaming thing is so ridiculous.
Someone should retort with concrete shaming, since it's as difficult to replace as flying yet emits three times as many pollutants.
Well maybe I'll have a little more leg room on flights, so it's not all bad.
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 04, 2019 8:13 pm
by Bi_3
Green Habit wrote:Bi_3 wrote:I like how AOC backed off of flight shaming in the GND yet now that is a thing.
The flight shaming thing is so ridiculous.
Someone should retort with concrete shaming, since it's as difficult to replace as flying yet emits three times as many pollutants.
Related question: is spending two weeks sailing across the Atlantic on a racing yacht to complain to the UN about climate change literal showboating?
Re: AOC
Posted: Fri October 11, 2019 7:00 pm
by Green Habit
Re: AOC
Posted: Sat October 12, 2019 3:45 am
by Bammer
This is why I wouldn’t want to be a public figure
Re: AOC
Posted: Sat October 12, 2019 2:13 pm
by Bi_3
This is the disingenuous complaint about lowlights since that dumb bitch next to me at Wrigley I in 2016
Re: AOC
Posted: Sat October 12, 2019 5:54 pm
by Bammer
Bi_3 wrote:This is the disingenuous complaint about lowlights since that dumb bitch next to me at Wrigley I in 2016
Take it to the Things Overheard thread
Re: AOC
Posted: Sat October 12, 2019 6:03 pm
by Green Habit
Nice 10:1 ratio he's got going here.
Re: AOC
Posted: Sat October 12, 2019 6:05 pm
by Bammer
Is it just me or did he put his phone cover back together with scotch tape?
- Spoiler: show
- By the way, who the hell is that?
Re: AOC
Posted: Sun October 13, 2019 1:50 am
by verb_to_trust
Do these dumb fucks not actually know how much a decent color and cut is for a woman?
Re: AOC
Posted: Sun October 13, 2019 4:07 am
by 96583UP
you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200
Re: AOC
Posted: Sun October 13, 2019 4:08 am
by Bammer
96583UP wrote:you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200
I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d
Re: AOC
Posted: Sun October 13, 2019 4:18 am
by 96583UP
Bammer wrote:96583UP wrote:you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200
I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d
- Spoiler: show
