harmless wrote:Things don't have to be "very hard to figure out" to be worth writing on a rock band's forum.
I know this. Just sayin' there's no code being cracked. It's pretty self-evident is all.
I'm very appreciative that I got to read another of your opinions tonight.
You're welcome.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 7:00 pm
by Lament
You have to track down Jack Irons and find out conclusively whether or not Red Dot and Small Mosquito are the same song.
Or find vaginas in the artwork for every previous record.
Your choice.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 7:00 pm
by IlluminEddie
harmless wrote:What shall be my penance?
To not post for 24 hours. Too hard? Make it 24 minutes. Something easier for you... 24 seconds.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 7:02 pm
by IlluminEddie
Lament wrote:harmless, just apologize for wasting our time by drawing parallels between the lyrics & a Biblical passage. As a board full of Bible scholars, we're all kind of offended that you're reiterating exactly what 90% of us were apparently already thinking.
Yeh, it takes a Bible scholar to know what a "doubting Thomas" is. This place is full of genius.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 7:08 pm
by WtOB?
things are heating up in here.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 7:09 pm
by harmless
Where's Stip?
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 8:02 pm
by stip
I've am abstaining from all illumineddie debates for at least a week.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 11:43 pm
by Lament
IlluminEddie wrote:This place is full of genius.
The Illuminati just sent us here in order to distract you from warning the rest of the world of their looming, evil plot to enslave us all to a series of reptilian overlords. And it's apparently working.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri August 30, 2013 1:44 am
by IlluminEddie
Lament wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:This place is full of genius.
The Illuminati just sent us here in order to distract you from warning the rest of the world of their looming, evil plot to enslave us all to a series of reptilian overlords. And it's apparently working.
See I know you're lying because they're not reptiles. They're Zebras. Zebras with colorful wings.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri August 30, 2013 2:01 am
by Farmer John
Lament wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:This place is full of genius.
The Illuminati just sent us here in order to distract you from warning the rest of the world of their looming, evil plot to enslave us all to a series of reptilian overlords. And it's apparently working.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri August 30, 2013 2:26 am
by Lament
IlluminEddie wrote:
Lament wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:This place is full of genius.
The Illuminati just sent us here in order to distract you from warning the rest of the world of their looming, evil plot to enslave us all to a series of reptilian overlords. And it's apparently working.
See I know you're lying because they're not reptiles. They're Zebras. Zebras with colorful wings.
The chuckles are rolling right off of my forked tongue...
He can't get to an E bow out of, coming out of the finger-picking part... cause the first note is like on the one.
I guess you're right. Is he using this tremolo arm/bar thing?
Yes he is. There's no ebow there... but there should be.
*Edit: Sounds like he may be using a volume pedal as well. Hard to tell for sure.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:06 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
So it leaked. Still a soft love song.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:10 pm
by harmless
I hope we get a version ft. Skrillex.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:12 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
harmless wrote:I hope we get a version ft. Skrillex.
Ha! I meant to end my sentence with a question mark, as I was asking if it was still a soft love song. I haven't listened yet.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:16 pm
by tk
Someone help me put with this?
Thnkx.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:18 pm
by harmless
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
harmless wrote:I hope we get a version ft. Skrillex.
Ha! I meant to end my sentence with a question mark, as I was asking if it was still a soft love song. I haven't listened yet.
I'm 90% sure it's the isolated guitar and vocal from Wrigley. Sounds exactly the same, just without the big boominess caused by the microphone and no keyboard. He hasn't re-written the song unfortunately, but I'm in the camp that says it's not really a love song to his wife. I mean, it might've been that originally but on this album it won't be.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:19 pm
by EJ
harmless wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
harmless wrote:I hope we get a version ft. Skrillex.
Ha! I meant to end my sentence with a question mark, as I was asking if it was still a soft love song. I haven't listened yet.
I'm 90% sure it's the isolated guitar and vocal from Wrigley. Sounds exactly the same, just without the big boominess caused by the microphone and no keyboard. He hasn't re-written the song unfortunately, but I'm in the camp that says it's not really a love song to his wife. I mean, it might've been that originally but on this album it won't be.
The artwork implies that its about trees with genitals. They haven't touched that subject in awhile.
Re: New Song: Future Days
Posted: Fri September 06, 2013 5:20 pm
by harmless
EJ wrote:
harmless wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
harmless wrote:I hope we get a version ft. Skrillex.
Ha! I meant to end my sentence with a question mark, as I was asking if it was still a soft love song. I haven't listened yet.
I'm 90% sure it's the isolated guitar and vocal from Wrigley. Sounds exactly the same, just without the big boominess caused by the microphone and no keyboard. He hasn't re-written the song unfortunately, but I'm in the camp that says it's not really a love song to his wife. I mean, it might've been that originally but on this album it won't be.
The artwork implies that its about trees with genitals. They haven't touched that subject in awhile.