i got bugs wrote:I'd rather him tour to support an old album than one of the new sucky ones
The river is far from my fave bruce, but still..
Yup. I wouldn't be upset if I never heard a song from Working on a Dream again in my life.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Thu December 10, 2015 3:37 pm
by McParadigm
Monkey_Driven wrote:
i got bugs wrote:I'd rather him tour to support an old album than one of the new sucky ones
The river is far from my fave bruce, but still..
Yup. I wouldn't be upset if I never heard a song from Working on a Dream again in my life.
Reading the Peter Ames Carlin book left me thinking of late-era Bruce as being not all the different from Paul McCartney. Both reached a point where they were simultaneously invested in the idea of their own greatness and lacking any sort of a real tempering agent. And with Bruce it might actually be worse, because he doesn't even get bad reviews....ever....no matter how thoroughly he earns them.
Interview snippet stories about him bursting into the studio with We Take Care of Our Own, declaring it a hit and telling his young producer "this song is gonna change your life," do a lot to help me understand why his music has trended so tepid and unremarkable for so long. I guess I should just be happy that he's talented enough that, even in such a miserable feedback vacuum, he still manages to come up with the occasional Magic.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Fri December 11, 2015 3:31 pm
by Berasa_clotas
What do you guys think about this? I've only heard Nebraska as a solo album and I like it but...
I take back my earlier comment about not being into for the money. I got nose bleed seats on the opposite side of the arena because they were the only tickets that weren't 182 bucks a piece(fees included).
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Fri December 11, 2015 6:25 pm
by i got bugs
I'd like to go but I'm not paying 100.. last 3 times I saw him I paid a combined 55 bucks
Worst case scenario the fake bruce is playing near my house right after.. the bar down the street from me runs a pretty fun bus trip to it
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Sat December 12, 2015 10:13 pm
by dprival78
Monkey_Driven wrote:I take back my earlier comment about not being into for the money. I got nose bleed seats on the opposite side of the arena because they were the only tickets that weren't 182 bucks a piece(fees included).
i want to see him (never have), but i couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger on a 177 dollar nosebleed/opposite side of the arena ticket - which is all i could get to come up for hartford.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Sat December 12, 2015 11:13 pm
by oasisfan35
dprival78 wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:I take back my earlier comment about not being into for the money. I got nose bleed seats on the opposite side of the arena because they were the only tickets that weren't 182 bucks a piece(fees included).
i want to see him (never have), but i couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger on a 177 dollar nosebleed/opposite side of the arena ticket - which is all i could get to come up for hartford.
I really hope he hits up the Oakdale for the solo tour.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon December 21, 2015 4:19 am
by evenslow
Do we know if Jake Clemons is any good at his instrument? I'm too dumb to know shit about the sax, but he seemed a bit shaky on SNL last night.
Not that he has to be Coltrane or anything but I felt like doing this to him
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon December 21, 2015 4:39 am
by tragabigzanda
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon December 21, 2015 5:10 am
by LetMeSleep
So they're playing the entire The River album. Arrgghh. No thanks. Do a 9-10 song album set every night but change it up.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon December 21, 2015 2:58 pm
by Monkey_Driven
That first song on SNL sucked.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon December 21, 2015 3:37 pm
by Kevin Davis
Yeah, I didn't think it was anything special either.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Tue December 22, 2015 12:22 pm
by super nintendo chalmers
I'm going in January. Never saw The Bruce, so fuck it. I just hope I don't get into a fistfight.
Sure thing. He sounds pretty good on the Eagles song.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Mon January 25, 2016 3:55 pm
by Monkey_Driven
I downloaded it but I probably won't listen to the River part of the show until after the concert in St. Louis I'm going to. Take it Easy does sound great.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Wed April 13, 2016 4:57 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Working on a Dream is so underrated. Such a good album. My only reservation is that goddamn production.
Re: Bruce Springsteen
Posted: Wed April 13, 2016 7:39 pm
by Monkey_Driven
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Working on a Dream is so underrated. Such a good album. My only reservation is that goddamn production.