Page 25 of 59
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Fri June 09, 2017 2:48 pm
by epilogue
Simple Torture wrote:VinylGuy wrote:Simple Torture wrote:VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
- Spoiler: show
- Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.
That was the explanation? I want to know how bob created him at least.
This ain't Lost, homie.
Yeah, the how isn't all that interesting to me. I'm much more interested in seeing how the "unexpected" results play out now that both Coopers are out. And that shit ain't supposed to happen.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Sun June 11, 2017 1:35 am
by Birds in Hell
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Sun June 11, 2017 4:40 pm
by epilogue
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 7:37 am
by parasolmonster
Episode 6
- Spoiler: show
- - I want all the bad things in the world to happen to Richard Horne. The hit and run scene was gut wrenching. I have never experienced a reaction like that. Maybe it's because I have two little kids and I always worry about that kind of stuff, but that was one of the most upsetting things I have ever watched on screen.
- I'm assuming Hawk found the missing pages in Laura's Diary? I can't believe it never occurred to me that the pages would be the missing piece of evidence.
- I'm so glad that they brought back the giggling waitress.
- Diane!
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 9:37 am
by washing machine
- Spoiler: show
- Well that was a fairly straightforward Twin Peaks episode until one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen on screen happened.
Also, I heart Naomi Watts in this.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 1:36 pm
by epilogue
I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 1:36 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 1:37 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 1:38 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.
Come ON
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 2:20 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.
Come ON
Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 2:50 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.
Come ON
Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.
IT COULD BE IMPORTANT PEARL JAM
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 3:06 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebook
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.
Come ON
Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.
IT COULD BE IMPORTANT PEARL JAM
OR IT COULD BE A GIANT FUCKING SNAKE EATING A PERSON
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 5:30 pm
by parasolmonster
washing machine wrote:- Spoiler: show
- Well that was a fairly straightforward Twin Peaks episode until one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen on screen happened.
I'm glad it wasn't just me. . .
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 9:48 pm
by washing machine
- Spoiler: show
- I'm so happy Harry Dean Stanton was around for this reprise. I was JUST talking about those trailer park happenings a few pages ago. Weird.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 11:11 pm
by parasolmonster
washing machine wrote:- Spoiler: show
- I'm so happy Harry Dean Stanton was around for this reprise. I was JUST talking about those trailer park happenings a few pages ago. Weird.
No kidding. He's such an intriguing character.
The Secret History of a Twin Peaks spoiler:
- Spoiler: show
- I get the feeling that I'm the only one on here that has read the book, but it provides a little bit of backstory on his character. In FWW he makes a statement about "not wanting to go back there". This is a reference to the Black Lodge. He was abducted as a child along with The Log Lady, and either the mayor or the mayor's brother (I can't remember).
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Mon June 12, 2017 11:35 pm
by washing machine
Not sure I want to read that book, honestly. Just that spoiler alone has me conflicted.
It's a weird line a lot of us are toeing with this show from week to week now that we're actively watching it with other fans. On the one hand, discussion of characters and scenes inevitably leads to theorizing, but on the other hand I just want to live in the shadows of this mysterious world observing and feeling everything as it happens onscreen.
I'm interested in that scene I mentioned above more because how it's woven into the theme and mood of FWWM than I am in that character's extensive backstory, yet I still find myself drawn to knowing as much as I can about him and that place.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Tue June 13, 2017 12:58 am
by VinylGuy
- Spoiler: show
- Cool episode...nice to see diane!! The hit and run was fucking gruesome but the reaction of those extras...man, there were so fucking awful.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Tue June 13, 2017 1:10 am
by parasolmonster
washing machine wrote:Not sure I want to read that book, honestly. Just that spoiler alone has me conflicted.
It's a weird line a lot of us are toeing with this show from week to week now that we're actively watching it with other fans. On the one hand, discussion of characters and scenes inevitably leads to theorizing, but on the other hand I just want to live in the shadows of this mysterious world observing and feeling everything as it happens onscreen.
I'm interested in that scene I mentioned above more because how it's woven into the theme and mood of FWWM than I am in that character's extensive backstory, yet I still find myself drawn to knowing as much as I can about him and that place.
Truthfully, you don't get much from the book. It's mostly the history of the owl ring. It fits in pretty well with keeping the mystery of the show.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Tue June 13, 2017 1:57 am
by epilogue
Outstanding episode. Tense. Violent. Hilarious. Awful. Stuff is coming together in only the way it can on Twin Peaks. There is so much here to digest and discus and thunk about. I fucking LOVE this show.
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Posted: Tue June 13, 2017 2:05 pm
by Birds in Hell
washing machine wrote:- Spoiler: show
- Well that was a fairly straightforward Twin Peaks episode until one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen on screen happened.
Also, I heart Naomi Watts in this.
She's been totally amazing.
